Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30410571›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2018

Feasibility and acceptability of strategies to address mental health and mental ill-health in the Australian coal mining industry.

Ross J Tynan, Carole James, Robyn Considine, Jaelea Skehan, Jorgen Gullestrup, Terry J Lewin, John Wiggers, Brian J Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Interventions to reduce the stigma of mental health at work: a narrative review.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of a Suicide Prevention Program for the Energy Sector.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ross J TynanEverymind, PO Box 833, Newcastle, NSW 2300 Australia.
Carole James2Centre for Resources Health and Safety, NIER, University of Newcastle, 70 Vale Street, Shortland, NSW Australia.
Robyn Considine3School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Hunter Building, University Drive, Callaghan, PO Box 833, Newcastle, NSW 2300 Australia.
Jaelea SkehanEverymind, PO Box 833, Newcastle, NSW 2300 Australia.
Jorgen GullestrupMATES in Construction, Spring Hill, QLD Australia.
Terry J Lewin5Centre for Brain and Mental Health Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, PO Box 833, Newcastle, NSW 2300 Australia.
John Wiggers3School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Hunter Building, University Drive, Callaghan, PO Box 833, Newcastle, NSW 2300 Australia.
Brian J Kelly2Centre for Resources Health and Safety, NIER, University of Newcastle, 70 Vale Street, Shortland, NSW Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of implementing a peer-based, multi-component mental health program in the Australian coal mining industry.

methodsThe multicomponent program included MATES in mining (a peer-based mental health and suicide prevention program) and supervisor training. Eight Australian coal mines participated in the research, with four mines receiving the mental health program. Primary outcome variables including mental health stigma, help-seeking behaviour and perception of the workplace commitment to mental health were measured prior to program implementation, and then again 10 months following using a paper based survey. Process evaluation of the mental health program was measured using a pre-test/post-test survey.

results

conclusionsOur findings show evidence to support the use of peer-based mental health programs in the mining industry, and for male-dominated industry more broadly.

Indexed as

CoalMental healthMiningPeer-supportWorkplace health

Identifiers

PMID30410571
PMCPMC6211480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.