Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30410451›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2018

An Overview on Current Non-invasive Diagnostic Devices in Oral Oncology.

Marco Mascitti, Giovanna Orsini, Vincenzo Tosco, Riccardo Monterubbianesi, Andrea Balercia, Angelo Putignano, Maurizio Procaccini, Andrea Santarelli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Noninvasive Imaging Techniques as Modern Diagnostic Tools in Desquamative Gingivitis: Focus on RCM, OCT, and LC-OCT.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Review
  5. Photodynamic Therapy Modulates pri-miRNA Expression inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Prospective Double-Blinded Comparison of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Conventional Histopathology for In Vivo Assessment in Oral Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Autofluorescence Image-Guided Endoscopy in the Management of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Tumors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco MascittiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Giovanna OrsiniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Vincenzo ToscoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Riccardo MonterubbianesiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Andrea BalerciaDepartment of Oral and Head-Neck Surgery, Umberto I General Hospital, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Angelo PutignanoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Maurizio ProcacciniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Andrea SantarelliDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Marche Polytechnic University · ITIstituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common head and neck malignancy, and despite advances in cancer therapies, the overall 5-year survival rate has remained below 50% over the past decades. OSCC is typically preceded by potentially malignant disorders (PMD), but distinguishing high-risk from low-risk PMD is challenging. In the last years, several diagnostic methods as light-based detection systems (LBDS) have been proposed to facilitate the detection of OSCC and PMD. Furthermore, the recent evolution of nanotechnology may provide new opportunities to detect PMD and OSCC at an early stage. Indeed, several preclinical studies showed the potential of nanotechnology to enhance diagnostic accuracy. For these reasons, it is fundamental to conduct studies to evaluate the efficacy of nanotechnology implementation in LBDS. The aim of this article is to review the current literature on LBDS and to provide a summary of the sensitivity and specificity of each technique, and possible future applications of nanotechnologies. The LBDS showed great potential for screening and monitoring oral lesions, but there are several factors that hinder an extensive use of these devices. These devices seem to be useful in assessing lesion margins that must be biopsied. However, to date, conventional oral examination, and tissue biopsy remain the gold standard for OSCC diagnosis. The use of nanotechnologies could be the next step in the evolution of LBDS, thus providing devices that can help clinicians to detect and better monitor oral lesions.

Indexed as

autofluorescencechemiluminescenceearly diagnosislight-based detection systemnanotechnologyOSCC

Identifiers

PMID30410451
PMCPMC6209963
OpenAlexW2898229335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.