Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30409220›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2018

Detection of an amplification bias associated to Leuconostocaceae family with a universal primer routinely used for monitoring microbial community structures within food products.

Simon Poirier, Olivier Rué, Gwendoline Coeuret, Marie-Christine Champomier-Vergès, Valentin Loux, Stéphane Chaillou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon PoirierMICALIS, INRA AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Domaine de Vilvert, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Olivier RuéMaIAGE, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, Domaine de Vilvert, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Gwendoline CoeuretMICALIS, INRA AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Domaine de Vilvert, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Marie-Christine Champomier-VergèsMICALIS, INRA AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Domaine de Vilvert, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Valentin LouxMaIAGE, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, Domaine de Vilvert, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Stéphane ChaillouMICALIS, INRA AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Domaine de Vilvert, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France. stephane.chaillou@inra.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2229-0697
Université Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

ANR ANR-16-CE21-0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSequencing of 16S rDNA V3-V4 region is widely applied for food community profiling. However, two different universal forward primers (named here MUYZER-primer1 and KLINDWORTH-primer2) targeting an identical conservative sequence upstream of the V3 region of 16S rRNA gene, and only distinguished by a single mismatch are both used. This study was carried out to compare whether the accuracy of food microbiota analysis would depend on the choice of one of these two primers.

resultsAlignment of both primers with common food-borne bacteria 16S sequences revealed that the mismatch between both primers might specifically affect the amplification of Leuconostoc, Oenococcus and Fructobacillus species but not Weissella species. Food products containing either Leuconostoc and/or Weissella were selected for a detection test. As expected from our in silico analysis, our study showed that this mismatch induced a strong biased amplification specifically associated to the OTUs belonging to the genus Leuconostoc but not to the genus Weissella. In presence of Muyzer-primer1, none of the sequences expected for Leuconostoc genus was detected whereas those sequences were correctly amplified with Klindworth-primer2. Since Leuconostoc is an important genus in food, agro-environments and in digestive tract of animals, we recommend that Muyzer-primer1 should thus be abandoned for the bacterial characterization of their associated microbiota.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSequence Analysis, DNAAnimalsDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalLeuconostocaceaeMeat ProductsPoultry ProductsRed MeatDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA, Ribosomal16S rDNA amplification biasFood microbiotaLeuconostoc genusMiSeq pair-end sequencingV3 universal primer

Identifiers

PMID30409220
PMCPMC6225703
OpenAlexW2900037639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.