Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30409200›Full record

Trial reportBMC veterinary research2018

Postoperative pain and short-term complications after two elective sterilization techniques: ovariohysterectomy or ovariectomy in cats.

Marco Aurélio A Pereira, Lucas A Gonçalves, Marina C Evangelista, Rosana S Thurler, Karina D Campos, Maira R Formenton, Geni C F Patricio, Julia M Matera, Aline M Ambrósio, Denise T Fantoni

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC veterinary research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ovarian pedicle hemostasis techniques in cats.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco Aurélio A PereiraFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, 87, Av Professor Doutor Orlando Marques de Paiva, Sao Paulo, 05508-270, Brazil.
Lucas A GonçalvesFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, 87, Av Professor Doutor Orlando Marques de Paiva, Sao Paulo, 05508-270, Brazil.
Marina C EvangelistaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
Rosana S ThurlerFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, 87, Av Professor Doutor Orlando Marques de Paiva, Sao Paulo, 05508-270, Brazil.
Karina D CamposFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, 87, Av Professor Doutor Orlando Marques de Paiva, Sao Paulo, 05508-270, Brazil.
Maira R FormentonFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, 87, Av Professor Doutor Orlando Marques de Paiva, Sao Paulo, 05508-270, Brazil.
Geni C F PatricioFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, 87, Av Professor Doutor Orlando Marques de Paiva, Sao Paulo, 05508-270, Brazil.
Julia M MateraFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, 87, Av Professor Doutor Orlando Marques de Paiva, Sao Paulo, 05508-270, Brazil.
Aline M AmbrósioFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, 87, Av Professor Doutor Orlando Marques de Paiva, Sao Paulo, 05508-270, Brazil.
Denise T FantoniFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, 87, Av Professor Doutor Orlando Marques de Paiva, Sao Paulo, 05508-270, Brazil. dfantoni@usp.br.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical sterilization of cats is one of the most commonly performed procedures in veterinary practice and it can be accomplished by two different techniques: ovariohysterectomy (OVH) or ovariectomy (OVE). Although there is an apparent preference for OVH in United States and Canada, OVE seems to be the standard of care in many European countries due to its advantages, such as a smaller surgical incision and potentially less complications associated with surgical manipulation of the uterus. The aim of this randomized, blind, prospective study was to compare postoperative pain and short-term complications in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy or ovariectomy.

methodsTwenty female cats were randomly assigned into two groups (OVH, n = 10 and OVE, n = 10). Pain was assessed prior to surgery (baseline) and 1, 2, 4, 8 12 and 24 h after the procedure using pain and sedation scales, physiologic parameters and blood glucose levels. Short-term complications were evaluated in the early postoperative period and reassessed at day 7 and day 10.

resultsChanges in cardiovascular parameters were not clinically relevant, however cats in OVH group had higher heart rates at T1 h compared with baseline (p = 0.0184). Blood glucose levels in OVH group were also higher at T1 h compared with baseline (p = 0.0135) and with OVE group (p = 0.0218). Surgical time was higher in OVH group (p = 0.0115). Even though no significant differences in pain scores were observed between groups or time points, cats in OVH group had greater need for rescue analgesia compared with OVE (2/10 and 0/10, respectively). Complications were not observed in any cat during surgery, at days 7 and 10 postoperatively or at discharge.

conclusionsBoth surgical techniques promoted similar intensity of postoperative pain in cats and there were no short-term complications throughout the study's evaluation period. Therefore, both techniques may be indicated for surgical sterilization of cats, according to the surgeon's preference and expertise. Cats that underwent ovariectomy did not require rescue analgesia and surgical time was shorter in that group.

Indexed as

AnimalsCat DiseasesCatsFemaleHysterectomyOvariectomyPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodAnalgesiaCatsOvariectomyOvariohysterectomyPainReproductive sterilization

Identifiers

PMID30409200
PMCPMC6225582
OpenAlexW2900372025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.