Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30409186›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2018

Propofol vs. inhalational agents to maintain general anaesthesia in ambulatory and in-patient surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Stefan Schraag, Lorenzo Pradelli, Abdul Jabbar Omar Alsaleh, Marco Bellone, Gianni Ghetti, Tje Lin Chung, Martin Westphal, Sebastian Rehberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06540885 (A Comparison Between Palonosetron Versus Granisetron As Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis In Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 83 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
21.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06540885 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Comparison Between Palonosetron Versus Granisetron As Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis In Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MalayaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled74ConditionsPostoperative Nausea and Vomiting, ScoliosisArmsPalonosetron (Group P), Granisetron (Group G)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefan SchraagDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, G81 4DY, Scotland, UK. stefanschraag@icloud.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2375-9549
Lorenzo PradelliAdRes-Health Economics and Outcome Research, Torino, Italy.
Abdul Jabbar Omar AlsalehAdRes-Health Economics and Outcome Research, Torino, Italy.
Marco BelloneAdRes-Health Economics and Outcome Research, Torino, Italy.
Gianni GhettiAdRes-Health Economics and Outcome Research, Torino, Italy.
Tje Lin ChungFresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Martin WestphalFresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Sebastian RehbergDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, Greifswald, Germany.
Fresenius (Germany) · DEGolden Jubilee National Hospital · GBUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is unclear if anaesthesia maintenance with propofol is advantageous or beneficial over inhalational agents. This study is intended to compare the effects of propofol vs. inhalational agents in maintaining general anaesthesia on patient-relevant outcomes and patient satisfaction.

methodsStudies were identified by electronic database searches in PubMed™, EMBASE™ and the Cochrane™ library between 01/01/1985 and 01/08/2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of peer-reviewed journals were studied. Of 6688 studies identified, 229 RCTs were included with a total of 20,991 patients. Quality control, assessment of risk of bias, meta-bias, meta-regression and certainty in evidence were performed according to Cochrane. Common estimates were derived from fixed or random-effects models depending on the presence of heterogeneity. Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was the primary outcome. Post-operative pain, emergence agitation, time to recovery, hospital length of stay, post-anaesthetic shivering and haemodynamic instability were considered key secondary outcomes.

resultsThe risk for PONV was lower with propofol than with inhalational agents (relative risk (RR) 0.61 [0.53, 0.69], p < 0.00001). Additionally, pain score after extubation and time in the post-operative anaesthesia care unit (PACU) were reduced with propofol (mean difference (MD) - 0.51 [- 0.81, - 0.20], p = 0.001; MD - 2.91 min [- 5.47, - 0.35], p = 0.03). In turn, time to respiratory recovery and tracheal extubation were longer with propofol than with inhalational agents (MD 0.82 min [0.20, 1.45], p = 0.01; MD 0.70 min [0.03, 1.38], p = 0.04, respectively). Notably, patient satisfaction, as reported by the number of satisfied patients and scores, was higher with propofol (RR 1.06 [1.01, 1.10], p = 0.02; MD 0.13 [0.00, 0.26], p = 0.05). Secondary analyses supported the primary results.

conclusionsBased on the present meta-analysis there are several advantages of anaesthesia maintenance with propofol over inhalational agents. While these benefits result in an increased patient satisfaction, the clinical and economic relevance of these findings still need to be addressed in adequately powered prospective clinical trials.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousHumansPostoperative PainPropofolRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofolDesfluraneInhalational AnaesthesiaIsofluranePatient Reported OutcomesPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainPropofolSevofluraneTarget Controlled InfusionTotal Intravenous Anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID30409186
PMCPMC6225663
OpenAlexW2899852599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.