Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30409183›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Dissection of the molecular bases of genotype x environment interactions: a study of phenotypic plasticity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in grape juices.

Emilien Peltier, Vikas Sharma, Maria Martí Raga, Miguel Roncoroni, Margaux Bernard, Vladimir Jiranek, Yves Gibon, Philippe Marullo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Endo metabolomic profiling ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic Adaptations ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Marker Assisted Selection of Malic-ConsumingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emilien PeltierUniv. Bordeaux, ISVV, Unité de recherche OEnologie EA 4577, USC 1366 INRA, Bordeaux INP, Villenave d'Ornon, France. emilien.peltier@u-bordeaux.fr.
Vikas SharmaUniv. Bordeaux, ISVV, Unité de recherche OEnologie EA 4577, USC 1366 INRA, Bordeaux INP, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Maria Martí RagaUniv. Bordeaux, ISVV, Unité de recherche OEnologie EA 4577, USC 1366 INRA, Bordeaux INP, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Miguel RoncoroniWine Science Programme, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland, 92019, New Zealand.
Margaux BernardUniv. Bordeaux, ISVV, Unité de recherche OEnologie EA 4577, USC 1366 INRA, Bordeaux INP, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Vladimir JiranekDepartment of Wine and Food Science, University of Adelaide, Urrbrae, South Australia, 5064, Australia.
Yves GibonINRA, University of Bordeaux, UMR 1332 Fruit Biology and Pathology, F-33883, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Philippe MarulloUniv. Bordeaux, ISVV, Unité de recherche OEnologie EA 4577, USC 1366 INRA, Bordeaux INP, Villenave d'Ornon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3594-5173

Funding

Conseil Régional Aquitaine NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability of a genotype to produce different phenotypes according to its surrounding environment is known as phenotypic plasticity. Within different individuals of the same species, phenotypic plasticity can vary greatly. This contrasting response is caused by gene-by-environment interactions (GxE). Understanding GxE interactions is particularly important in agronomy, since selected breeds and varieties may have divergent phenotypes according to their growing environment. Industrial microbes such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae are also faced with a large range of fermentation conditions that affect their technological properties. Finding the molecular determinism of such variations is a critical task for better understanding the genetic bases of phenotypic plasticity and can also be helpful in order to improve breeding methods.

resultsIn this study we implemented a QTL mapping program using two independent cross (~ 100 progeny) in order to investigate the molecular basis of yeast phenotypic response in a wine fermentation context. Thanks to whole genome sequencing approaches, both crosses were genotyped, providing saturated genetic maps of thousands of markers. Linkage analyses allowed the detection of 78 QTLs including 21 with significant interaction with the environmental conditions. Molecular dissection of a major QTL demonstrated that the sulfite pump Ssu1p has a pleiotropic effect and impacts the phenotypic plasticity of several traits.

conclusionsThe detection of QTLs and their interactions with environment emphasizes the complexity of yeast industrial traits. The validation of the interaction of SSU1 allelic variants with the nature of the fermented juice increases knowledge about the impact of the sulfite pump during fermentation. All together these results pave the way for exploiting and deciphering the genetic determinism of phenotypic plasticity.

Indexed as

FermentationGene-Environment InteractionPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsVitisWineSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsEnologyFermentationGene–environment interactionQTL mappingYeast

Identifiers

PMID30409183
PMCPMC6225642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.