Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30409164›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2018

Putting family into family-based obesity prevention: enhancing participant engagement through a novel integrated knowledge translation strategy.

Kathryn Walton, Tory Ambrose, Angela Annis, David Wl Ma, Jess Haines, Guelph Family Health Study Family Advisory Council; on behalf of the Guelph Family Health Study

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. 'It reshaped how I will do research': A qualitative exploration of team members' experiences with youth and family engagement in a randomized controlled trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryn WaltonDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada. kwalton@uoguelph.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9794-2592
Tory AmbroseDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Angela AnnisDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
David Wl MaDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Jess HainesDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Guelph Family Health Study Family Advisory Council; on behalf of the Guelph Family Health Study
University of Guelph · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith 1 in 4 Canadian preschoolers considered overweight or obese, identifying risk factors for excess weight gain and developing effective interventions aimed at promoting healthy weights and related behaviours among young children have become key public health priorities. Despite the need for this research, engaging and maintaining participation is a critical challenge for long-term, family-based studies. The aim of this study is to describe the implementation and evaluation of a parent-only advisory council designed to engage participants in the implementation and evaluation of a longitudinal, family-based obesity prevention intervention.

methodsA Family Advisory Council (n = 14 parents, 70% mothers, 64% white), was established to engage participant stakeholders in decisions related to research protocols and strategies to engage and sustain family participation. Using a mixed methods approach, including a participant survey and focus group, we examined the council members' perceptions of their role and the impact this novel integrated Knowledge Translation (iKT) strategy had on the Guelph Family Health Study (GFHS), a longitudinal family-based study.

resultsAll members of the Family Advisory Council felt the topics discussed were appropriate, felt that their opinions were valued and that their suggestions have had an impact and direct benefit on the GFHS. The addition of the Family Advisory Council led to changes in study protocol (i.e. creation of more detailed intervention emails, creation of kid-friendly accelerometer bands) that may have contributed to the high retention rate of the GFHS (95% at 6-month follow-up).

conclusionsEngaging parents as research partners in family-based research studies may be an effective way to increase participant engagement and study retention.

Indexed as

Family HealthCanadaChild, PreschoolFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHealth SurveysHumansInfantMaleParentsPediatric ObesityPrevalenceResearchResearch DesignRisk FactorsChildhood obesityIntegrated knowledge translationParticipant engagementParticipatory research

Identifiers

PMID30409164
PMCPMC6225617
OpenAlexW2899522301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.