Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30409152›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

MAPLE-PD trial (Mesenteric Approach vs. Conventional Approach for Pancreatic Cancer during Pancreaticoduodenectomy): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 354 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Seiko Hirono, Manabu Kawai, Ken-Ichi Okada, Tsutomu Fujii, Masayuki Sho, Sohei Satoi, Ryosuke Amano, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuko Mataki, Masafumi Nakamura and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03317886 (Mesenteric Approach vs. Conventional Approach for Pancreatic Cancer During Pancreaticoduodenectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03317886 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Mesenteric Approach vs. Conventional Approach for Pancreatic Cancer During Pancreaticoduodenectomy (MAPLE-PD Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWakayama Medical UniversityRan2017 to 2021Enrolled354ConditionsPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Mesenteric ApproachArmspancreaticoduodenectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Isolated pancreatectomy using mesenteric approach.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. What do surgeons need to know about the mesopancreas.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [Surgery of pancreatic cancer: techniques to avoid local recurrence].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Pancreatic resection for cancer-the Heidelberg technique.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2019
    Review
  17. Conversion Surgery for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Review
  18. Local radicality and survival outcome of pancreatic cancer surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Seiko HironoSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Manabu KawaiSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Ken-Ichi OkadaSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Tsutomu FujiiDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Masayuki ShoDepartment of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Sohei SatoiDepartment of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Ryosuke AmanoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Osaka City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hidetoshi EguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Yuko MatakiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Masafumi NakamuraDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ippei MatsumotoDepartment of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Higashiosaka City, Japan.
Hideo BabaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Masaji TaniDepartment of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Ōtsu, Japan.
Yasunari KawabataDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo City, Japan.
Yuichi NagakawaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Suguru YamadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshiaki MurakamiDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Toshio ShimokawaClinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan.
Hiroki YamaueSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan. yamaue-h@wakayama-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6982-3457
Wakayama Medical University · JPHiroshima University · JPKagoshima University · JPKansai Medical University · JPKindai University · JPKumamoto University · JPKyushu University · JPNagoya University · JPNara Medical University · JPOsaka City University · JPShiga University of Medical Science · JPShimane University · JPThe University of Osaka · JPTokyo Medical University · JPUniversity of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mesenteric approach is an artery-first approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer, which starts with the dissection of connective tissues around the superior mesenteric artery. The procedure aims for early confirmation of resectability by checking the surgical margin around the superior mesenteric artery first during the operation. It also aims to decrease intraoperative blood loss by early ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery and to increase R0 rate by complete clearance of the lymph nodes around the superior mesenteric artery and pancreatic head plexus II, the most favorable positive margin site for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, it aims to avoid the spread of cancer cells during operation (nontouch isolation technique). The MAPLE-PD (Mesenteric Approach vs. Conventional Approach for Pancreatic Cancer during Pancreaticoduodenectomy) trial investigates whether the mesenteric approach can prolong the survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with the conventional approach. METHODS/

designThe MAPLE-PD trial is a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial that compares the surgical outcomes between the mesenteric and conventional approaches to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma scheduled to undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy are randomized before operation to either a conventional approach (arm A) or a mesenteric approach (arm B). In arm A, the operation starts with Kocher's maneuver. At the final step of the removal procedure, the connective tissues around the superior mesenteric artery are dissected. In arm B, the operation starts with dissection of the connective tissues around the superior mesenteric artery and ends with Kocher's maneuver. In total, 354 patients from 15 Japanese high-volume centers will be randomized. The primary endpoint is overall survival by intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary endpoints include intraoperative blood loss, R0 rate, and recurrence-free survival. DISCUSSION: If the MAPLE-PD trial shows the oncological benefits of the mesenteric approach for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, this procedure may become a standard approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03317886 . Registered on 23 October 2017. University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000029615 . Registered on 15 January 2018.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalConnective TissueEthics, ResearchHumansMesenteric Artery, SuperiorMulticenter Studies as TopicPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomySample SizeArtery-first approachBorderline resectable pancreatic cancerConventional approachMesenteric approachPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaPancreaticoduodenectomyR0 resectionResectable pancreatic cancerSuperior mesenteric artery

Identifiers

PMID30409152
PMCPMC6225694
OpenAlexW2900425230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.