Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30409150›Full record

Trial reportBMC urology2018

Multiparametric ultrasound: evaluation of greyscale, shear wave elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for prostate cancer detection and localization in correlation to radical prostatectomy specimens.

Christophe K Mannaerts, Rogier R Wildeboer, Arnoud W Postema, Johanna Hagemann, Lars Budäus, Derya Tilki, Massimo Mischi, Hessel Wijkstra, Georg Salomon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03091231 (Multiparametric Ultrasound - Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography Compared to Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in 50 Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03091231 completednot on this map

Multiparametric Ultrasound - Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography Compared to Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in 50 Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorMartini-Klinik am UKE GmbHRan2017 to 2018Enrolled50ConditionsProstate CancerArmsmpUS multiparametric Ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christophe K MannaertsDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.k.mannaerts@amc.uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3824-5631
Rogier R WildeboerDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Arnoud W PostemaDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johanna HagemannMartini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Lars BudäusMartini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Derya TilkiMartini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Massimo MischiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Hessel WijkstraDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Georg SalomonMartini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLEindhoven University of Technology · NL

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding UVA 2013-5941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer (PCa) is advancing towards an imaging-driven approach. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, although increasingly used, has not shown sufficient accuracy to replace biopsy for now. The introduction of new ultrasound (US) modalities, such as quantitative contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) and shear wave elastography (SWE), shows promise but is not evidenced by sufficient high quality studies, especially for the combination of different US modalities. The primary objective of this study is to determine the individual and complementary diagnostic performance of greyscale US (GS), SWE, CEUS and their combination, multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS), for the detection and localization of PCa by comparison with corresponding histopathology. METHODS/

designIn this prospective clinical trial, US imaging consisting of GS, SWE and CEUS with quantitative mapping on 3 prostate imaging planes (base, mid and apex) will be performed in 50 patients with biopsy-proven PCa before planned radical prostatectomy using a clinical ultrasound scanner. All US imaging will be evaluated by US readers, scoring the four quadrants of each imaging plane for the likelihood of significant PCa based on a 1 to 5 Likert Scale. Following resection, PCa tumour foci will be identified, graded and attributed to the imaging-derived quadrants in each prostate plane for all prostatectomy specimens. Primary outcome measure will be the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of each US modality and mpUS to detect and localize significant PCa evaluated for different Likert Scale thresholds using receiver operating characteristics curve analyses. DISCUSSION: In the evaluation of new PCa imaging modalities, a structured comparison with gold standard radical prostatectomy specimens is essential as first step. This trial is the first to combine the most promising ultrasound modalities into mpUS. It complies with the IDEAL stage 2b recommendations and will be an important step towards the evaluation of mpUS as a possible option for accurate detection and localization of PCa.

trial registrationThe study protocol for multiparametric ultrasound was prospectively registered on Clinicaltrials.gov on 14 March 2017 with the registry name 'Multiparametric Ultrasound-Study for the Detection of Prostate Cancer' and trial registration number NCT03091231.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleProspective StudiesProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsAccuracyDetectionImagingMultiparametricProstate cancerRadical prostatectomyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID30409150
PMCPMC6225621
OpenAlexW2899775216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.