Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30408207›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2019

Intradonor reproducibility and changes in hemolytic variables during red blood cell storage: results of recall phase of the REDS-III RBC-Omics study.

Marion C Lanteri, Tamir Kanias, Sheila Keating, Mars Stone, Yuelong Guo, Grier P Page, Donald J Brambilla, Stacy M Endres-Dighe, Alan E Mast, Walter Bialkowski and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06840756 (Effects of Donor-recipient Sex-matched Versus Sex-mismatched Red Blood Cell Transfusion on Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06840756 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Donor-recipient Sex-matched Versus Sex-mismatched Red Blood Cell Transfusion on Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorMichelle ZellerRan2025 to 2029Enrolled11,082ConditionsRed Blood Cell Transfusions, Sex Differences, Health Services, Critically Ill Intensive Care Unit PatientsArmsSex-mismatched red blood cell transfusions, Sex-matched red blood cell transfusions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. It's in your blood: The impact of age, sex, genetic factors and exposures on stored red blood cell metabolism.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Big Data in Transfusion Medicine and Artificial Intelligence Analysis for Red Blood Cell Quality Control.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023
    Review
  20. Omics Technologies in Veterinary Medicine: Literature Review and Perspectives in Transfusion Medicine.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Marion C LanteriVitalant Research Institute (previously Blood Systems Research Institute), University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Tamir KaniasPittsburgh Heart, Lung, Blood and Vascular Medicine Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0001-6558-0913
Sheila KeatingVitalant Research Institute (previously Blood Systems Research Institute), University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Mars StoneVitalant Research Institute (previously Blood Systems Research Institute), University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5619-2767
Yuelong GuoRTI International, Atlanta, Georgia.
Grier P PageRTI International, Atlanta, Georgia.
Donald J BrambillaRTI International, Rockville, Maryland.
Stacy M Endres-DigheRTI International, Rockville, Maryland.
Alan E MastBlood Research and Medical Sciences Institutes, Blood Center of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Walter BialkowskiBlood Research and Medical Sciences Institutes, Blood Center of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Pam D'AndreaThe Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ritchard G CableAmerican Red Cross, Farmington, Connecticut.
Bryan R SpencerAmerican Red Cross, Farmington, Connecticut.
Darrell J TriulziThe Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Edward L MurphyVitalant Research Institute (previously Blood Systems Research Institute), University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Steven KleinmanUniversity of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Mark T GladwinPittsburgh Heart, Lung, Blood and Vascular Medicine Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.
Michael P BuschVitalant Research Institute (previously Blood Systems Research Institute), University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
NHLBI Recipient Epidemiology Donor Evaluation Study (REDS)-III Program
University of California, San Francisco · USRTI International · USAmerican Red Cross · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USVersiti Blood Center of Wisconsin · USInstitute for Transfusion Medicine · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100005INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100007INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100008INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100009IWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic determinants may underlie the susceptibility of red blood cells (RBCs) to hemolyze in vivo and during routine storage. This study characterized the reproducibility and dynamics of in vitro hemolysis variables from a subset of the 13,403 blood donors enrolled in the RBC-Omics study. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsRBC-Omics donors with either low or high hemolysis results on 4°C-stored leukoreduced (LR)-RBC samples from enrollment donations stored for 39 to 42 days were recalled 2 to 12 months later to donate LR-RBCs. Samples of stored LR-RBCs from the unit and from transfer bags were evaluated for spontaneous and stress-induced hemolysis at selected storage time points. Intradonor reproducibility of hemolysis variables was evaluated in transfer bags over two donations. Hemolysis data at serial storage time points were generated on LR-RBCs from parent bags and analyzed by site, sex, race/ethnicity, and donation frequency.

resultsA total of 664 donors were successfully recalled. Analysis of intradonor reproducibility revealed that osmotic and oxidative hemolysis demonstrated good and moderate reproducibility (Pearson's r = 0.85 and r = 0.53, respectively), while spontaneous hemolysis reproducibility was poor (r = 0.40). Longitudinal hemolysis in parent bags showed large increases over time in spontaneous (508.6%) and oxidative hemolysis (399.8%) and smaller increases in osmotic (9.4%) and mechanical fragility (3.4%; all p < 0.0001).

conclusionSpontaneous hemolysis is poorly reproducible in donors over time and may depend on site processing methods, while oxidative and osmotic hemolysis were reproducible in donors and hence could reflect consistent heritable phenotypes attributable to genetic traits. Spontaneous and oxidative hemolysis increased over time of storage, whereas osmotic and mechanical hemolysis remained relatively stable.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsBlood PreservationErythrocytesFemaleHemolysisHumansKineticsMaleOsmosisOxidation-ReductionReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID30408207
PMCPMC7007704
OpenAlexW2899985143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.