Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30408131›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

What happens to migrant tuberculosis patients who are transferred out using a web-based system in China?

Tao Li, Xin Du, Hemant Deepak Shewade, Kyaw Thu Soe, Hui Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Strengthening Tuberculosis Control Among Migrant Workers.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Tao LiNational Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, China CDC, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3176-018X
Xin DuNational Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, China CDC, Beijing, China.
Hemant Deepak ShewadeInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), South-East Asia Office, New Delhi, India.
Kyaw Thu SoeDepartment of Medical Research (Pyin Oo Lwin Branch), Ministry of Health and Sports, Pyin Oo Lwin, The Republic of The Union of Myanmar.
Hui ZhangNational Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, China CDC, Beijing, China.
Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CNInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · FRMinistry of Health and Sports · MM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn China, internal migrants constitute one-fifth of tuberculosis (TB) patients registered for treatment in web-based TB information management system (TBIMS). Though China added a specific module in the web-based TBIMS in 2009, web-based transfer-out is not specifically recommended in the national guidelines.

objectiveIn this country wide study among all registered migrant TB patients (2014-2015) that were transferred out using web-based TBIMS in China, to determine the i) timing of transfer-out in relation to period of treatment; ii) delay and attrition during transfer interval (between transfer-out and transfer-in); and iii) extent and risk factors for 'not evaluated' as the treatment outcome.

methodsThis was a cohort study involving review of web-based TBIMS data. Modified Poisson regression was used to build a predictive model for risk factors of 'not evaluated' as the treatment outcome.

resultsAmong 7 284 patients, 5 900 (81.0%) were transferred out during the first two months after initiation of treatment or before treatment initiation and 7 088 (97.3%) patients had arrived at transfer-in unit. The median transfer interval was three (interquartile range: 0-14) days. Sixteen percent (1 176/7 284) patients had 'not evaluated' as their treatment outcome. 'Not evaluated' contributed to 66% of the unfavourable outcomes. Patients transferred from referral hospitals, migrated from out of prefecture, transferred out of prefecture, with sputum smear negative pulmonary TB, with TB pleurisy and with long delay between symptom onset and treatment initiation had significantly higher risk of 'not evaluated' as the outcome.

conclusionWeb-based transfer helped as the delay and attrition during the transfer interval was quite short and treatment outcomes of more than four-fifths of transferred out migrant TB patients were available with transfer-out BMU. Once strategies to address the independent predictors of 'not evaluated' treatment outcome are devised, China may consider mandatory use of web-based TBIMS for transferring out migrant TB patients.

Indexed as

Patient TransferTransients and MigrantsAdolescentAdultAgedChinaCohort StudiesFemaleHealth Information ManagementHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30408131
PMCPMC6224056
OpenAlexW2899829462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.