Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30408100›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Eustachian tube dysfunction: A diagnostic accuracy study and proposed diagnostic pathway.

Matthew E Smith, Yemisi Takwoingi, Jon Deeks, Cuneyt Alper, Manohar L Bance, Mahmood F Bhutta, Neil Donnelly, Dennis Poe, James R Tysome

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty for treatment of Eustachian tube dysfunction: A systematic review and Meta-analysis].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Otovent Versus Valsalva: Physiological Insights for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Autoinflation in Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Interplay Between Rhinosinusitis and Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessing the usefulness of tubomanometry as a diagnostic tool in Eustachian tube dysfunction.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew E SmithCambridge Ear Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8147-1549
Yemisi TakwoingiInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-9746
Jon DeeksInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Cuneyt AlperChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0551-8285
Manohar L BanceCambridge Ear Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mahmood F BhuttaBrighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Neil DonnellyCambridge Ear Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Dennis PoeBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
James R TysomeCambridge Ear Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBBoston Children's Hospital · USChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsEustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) is a commonly diagnosed disorder of Eustachian tube opening and closure, which may be associated with severe symptoms and middle ear disease. Currently the diagnosis of obstructive and patulous forms of ETD is primarily based on non-specific symptoms or examination findings, rather than measurement of the underlying function of the Eustachian tube. This has proved problematic when selecting patients for treatment, and when designing trial inclusion criteria and outcomes. This study aims to determine the correlation and diagnostic value of various tests of ET opening and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), in order to generate a recommended diagnostic pathway for ETD.

methodsIndex tests included two PROMs and 14 tests of ET opening (nine for obstructive, five for patulous ETD). In the absence of an accepted reference standard two methods were adopted to establish index test accuracy: expert panel diagnosis and latent class analysis. Index test results were assessed with Pearson correlation and principle component analysis, and test accuracy was determined. Logistic regression models assessed the predictive value of grouped test results.

resultsThe expert panel diagnosis and PROMs results correlated with each other, but not with ET function measured by tests of ET opening. All index tests were found to be feasible in clinic, and acceptable to patients. PROMs had very poor specificity, and no diagnostic value. Combining the results of tests of ET function appeared beneficial. The latent class model suggested tympanometry, sonotubometry and tubomanometry have the best diagnostic performance for obstructive ETD, and these are included in a proposed diagnostic pathway.

conclusionsETD should be diagnosed on the basis of clinical assessment and tests of ET opening, as PROMs have no diagnostic value. Currently diagnostic uncertainty exists for some patients who appear to have intermittent ETD clinically, but have negative index test results.

Indexed as

AdultAgedEar DiseasesEustachian TubeFemaleHearing TestsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPredictive Value of TestsPrincipal Component AnalysisReference Standards

Identifiers

PMID30408100
PMCPMC6224095
OpenAlexW2900028291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.