Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30408090›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Recovery planning towards doubling wild tiger Panthera tigris numbers: Detailing 18 recovery sites from across the range.

Abishek Harihar, Pranav Chanchani, Jimmy Borah, Rachel Jane Crouthers, Yury Darman, Thomas N E Gray, Shariff Mohamad, Benjamin Miles Rawson, Mark Darmaraj Rayan, Jennifer Lucy Roberts and 39 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Investigating the demography and dynamics of a low-density tiger population in Southeast Asia: What limits recovery?Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  2. From science to impact: Conserving ecological connectivity in large conservation landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Connecting tiger (Ecology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  6. How "science" can facilitate the politicization of charismatic megafauna counts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Synthesizing habitat connectivity analyses of a globally important human-dominated tiger-conservation landscape.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

49 authors.

Abishek HariharWWF-Tigers Alive Initiative, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2446-6345
Pranav ChanchaniWWF-India, New Delhi, India.
Jimmy BorahWWF-India, Assam, India.
Rachel Jane CrouthersWWF-Greater Mekong Program, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Yury DarmanWWF-Russia, Amur branch, Vladivostok, Russia.
Thomas N E GrayWWF-Greater Mekong Program, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Shariff MohamadWWF-Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Malaysia.
Benjamin Miles RawsonWWF-Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Mark Darmaraj RayanWWF-Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4163-3141
Jennifer Lucy RobertsWWF-Tigers Alive Initiative, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Robert SteinmetzWWF-Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sunarto SunartoWWF-Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Febri Anggriawan WidodoWWF-Indonesia, Central Sumatra Program, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia.
Meraj AnwarWWF-India, Terai Arc Landscape Office, Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India.
Shiv Raj BhattaWWF-Nepal, Programme Office, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Jayam Peter Prem ChakravarthiWWF-India, Western Ghats Nilgiris Landscape Office, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1205-356X
Youde ChangWWF-China, Changchun, Jilin Province, P. R. China.
Gordon CongdonWWF-Greater Mekong Program, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Chittaranjan DaveWWF-India, Satpura Maikal Landscape Office, Mandla, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Soumen DeyWWF-India, Satpura Maikal Landscape Office, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Boominathan DurairajWWF-India, Western Ghats Nilgiris Landscape Office, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Pavel FomenkoWWF-Russia, Amur branch, Vladivostok, Russia.
Harish GuleriaWWF-India, Terai Arc Landscape Office, Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India.
Mudit GuptaWWF-India Terai Arc Landscape Office, Pilibhit, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ghana GurungWWF-Nepal, Programme Office, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-3838-2804
Bopanna IttiraWWF-India, Programme Office, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Jyotirmay JenaWWF-India, Satpura Maikal Landscape Office, Balaghat, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Alexey KostyriaWWF-Russia, Amur branch, Vladivostok, Russia.
Krishna KumarWWF-India, Western Ghats Nilgiris Landscape Office, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vijay KumarWWF-India, Western Ghats Nilgiris Landscape Office, Bhavanisagar, Tamil Nadu, India.
Phurba LhendupWWF-Bhutan, Program Office, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Peiqi LiuWWF-China, Changchun, Jilin Province, P. R. China.
Sabita MallaWWF-Nepal, Programme Office, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kamlesh MauryaWWF-India Terai Arc Landscape Office, Pilibhit, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vijay MoktanWWF-Bhutan, Program Office, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Nguyen Dao Ngoc VanWWF-Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Karmila ParakkasiWWF-Tigers Alive Initiative, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Rungnapa PhoonjampaWWF-Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand.
Worrapan PhumaneeWWF-Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anil Kumar SinghWWF-India, Programme Office, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Carrie StengelWWF-Tigers Alive Initiative, Washington-D.C., United States of America.
Samundra Ambuhang SubbaWWF-Nepal, Programme Office, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kanchan ThapaWWF-Nepal, Programme Office, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Tiju C ThomasWWF-India, Western Ghats Nilgiris Landscape Office, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Christopher WongWWF-Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Malaysia.
Michael BaltzerWWF-Tigers Alive Initiative, Singapore.
Dipankar GhoseWWF-India, New Delhi, India.
Sejal WorahWWF-India, New Delhi, India.
Joseph VattakavenWWF-Tigers Alive Initiative, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With less than 3200 wild tigers in 2010, the heads of 13 tiger-range countries committed to doubling the global population of wild tigers by 2022. This goal represents the highest level of ambition and commitment required to turn the tide for tigers in the wild. Yet, ensuring efficient and targeted implementation of conservation actions alongside systematic monitoring of progress towards this goal requires that we set site-specific recovery targets and timelines that are ecologically realistic. In this study, we assess the recovery potential of 18 sites identified under WWF's Tigers Alive Initiative. We delineated recovery systems comprising a source, recovery site, and support region, which need to be managed synergistically to meet these targets. By using the best available data on tiger and prey numbers, and adapting existing species recovery frameworks, we show that these sites, which currently support 165 (118-277) tigers, have the potential to harbour 585 (454-739) individuals. This would constitute a 15% increase in the global population and represent over a three-fold increase within these specific sites, on an average. However, it may not be realistic to achieve this target by 2022, since tiger recovery in 15 of these 18 sites is contingent on the initial recovery of prey populations, which is a slow process. We conclude that while sustained conservation efforts can yield significant recoveries, it is critical that we commit our resources to achieving the biologically realistic targets for these sites even if the timelines are extended.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesTigersAnimalsAsiaGoalsPopulation DensityPredatory BehaviorTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID30408090
PMCPMC6224104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.