Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30408085›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Correlation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor subtypes and their receptors with melanoma progression: A next-generation Tissue Microarray (ngTMA) automated analysis.

S Morteza Seyed Jafari, Christina Wiedmer, Simone Cazzaniga, Živa Frangež, Maziar Shafighi, Helmut Beltraminelli, Benedikt Weber, Hans-Uwe Simon, Robert E Hunger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

S Morteza Seyed JafariDepartment of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6466-2199
Christina WiedmerDepartment of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Simone CazzanigaDepartment of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Živa FrangežInstitute of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Maziar ShafighiDepartment of Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Helmut BeltraminelliDepartment of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Benedikt WeberDepartment of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Hans-Uwe SimonInstitute of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Robert E HungerDepartment of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFinding new markers to assess prognosis of melanoma without the necessity to perform a surgical interventions is an important goal in melanoma research. The current study aimed to assess the correlation of clinical course and prognosis of primary and metastatic melanoma with expression of VEGF family and their receptors.

methodsA ngTMA block was made from the randomly selected paraffin tissue blocks of the patients with melanocytic nevi, primary and metastatic melanoma. Then sections cut from ngTMA-block were immunohistochemically stained with proper antibodies. Expression of these proteins was investigated using automated image analysis and compared among the study groups.

resultsWe analyzed the tissue of 238 patients with following diagnoses: 101 (42.4%) with a diagnosis of nevus, 86 (36.1%) Malignant melanoma and 51 (21.4%) metastasis. Median follow-up time for the malignant lesions was 5.71 years. Among the tested antigen, VEGF-C (p = 0.016), VEGF-R2 (p<0.001) and VEGF-R3 (p = 0.002) were significantly higher expressed in the metastatic tissues. When these scores were assessed in multiple regression models, the only independent factor linked to patient's diagnosis was VEGF-R2 (p<0.001). In addition, groups of highly correlated variables (VEGF-C and VEGF-R3, VEGF-A and VEGF-R1) were found to form separate sub-clusters. On the other side, high values of VEGF-C were associated with both overall and disease-free survival with a statically significant HR of 2.76 (95% CI: 1.27, 5.98; p = 0.01) and 2.82 (95%CI: 1.62, 4.91; p<0.001), respectively.

conclusionsThis study shows that VEGF-C and VEGF-R2 might represent new prognostic marker in MM. However, further prospective studies are warranted to test their real efficacy as a prognostic marker.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAutomationBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNevus, PigmentedPrincipal Component AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorProtein IsoformsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factors

Identifiers

PMID30408085
PMCPMC6224082
OpenAlexW2900117839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.