ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
Systematically benchmarking peptide-MHC binding predictors: From synthetic to naturally processed epitopes.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
99 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Challenges targeting cancer neoantigens in 2021: a systematic literature review.Expert review of vaccines · 2021Pooled it
- Neoantigen prediction and computational perspectives towards clinical benefit: recommendations from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2020Pooled it
- In silico design of a T-cell epitope vaccine candidate for parasitic helminth infection.PLoS pathogens · 2020Pooled it
- Discovery of Post-Translationally Modified Epitopes in Autoimmunity: Someone Has to Fish so Everyone Can Eat.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for translational personalized neoantigen cancer vaccine development.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- Benchmarking sequence-based and AlphaFold-based methods for pMHC-II binding core prediction: distinct strengths and consensus approaches.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- AI-driven neoantigen identification: a comprehensive review from somatic variant calling to T cell recognition.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Molecular origin, discovery, validation and application of neoantigens.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Review
- iPepGen: a modular, immunopeptidogenomic analysis pipeline for discovery, verification, and prioritization of cancer peptide neoantigen candidates.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in vaccine development: applications, implementation, and future directions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Computational Methods for Cancer Neoantigen Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Immunoinformatics and molecular docking reveal potential multi-epitope vaccine againstClinical and experimental vaccine research · 2026Article
- RNA-based cancer vaccines: mechanisms, clinical progress, and translational challenges.Immunologic research · 2025Review
- Identification of T-Cell Epitopes and Vaccine Development for African Swine Fever Virus.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Computational methods and data resources for predicting tumor neoantigens.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Advances in Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Their Obstacles, and Prospects Toward Tumor Immunotherapy.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Review
- In Silico-Designed TGFβRI/TGFβRII Receptor Complex Peptide Inhibitors Exhibit Biological Activity In Vitro.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Immunoinformatic strategy for developing multi-epitope subunit vaccine against Helicobacter pylori.PloS one · 2025Article
- mRNA vaccines transform personalized lung cancer treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- AI/ML-empowered approaches for predicting T Cell-mediated immunity and beyond.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of machine learning-based predictors have been developed for identifying immunogenic T-cell epitopes based on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II binding affinities. Rationally selecting the most appropriate tool has been complicated by the evolving training data and machine learning methods. Despite the recent advances made in generating high-quality MHC-eluted, naturally processed ligandome, the reliability of new predictors on these epitopes has yet to be evaluated. This study reports the latest benchmarking on an extensive set of MHC-binding predictors by using newly available, untested data of both synthetic and naturally processed epitopes. 32 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and 24 HLA class II alleles are included in the blind test set. Artificial neural network (ANN)-based approaches demonstrated better performance than regression-based machine learning and structural modeling. Among the 18 predictors benchmarked, ANN-based mhcflurry and nn_align perform the best for MHC class I 9-mer and class II 15-mer predictions, respectively, on binding/non-binding classification (Area Under Curves = 0.911). NetMHCpan4 also demonstrated comparable predictive power. Our customization of mhcflurry to a pan-HLA predictor has achieved similar accuracy to NetMHCpan. The overall accuracy of these methods are comparable between 9-mer and 10-mer testing data. However, the top methods deliver low correlations between the predicted versus the experimental affinities for strong MHC binders. When used on naturally processed MHC-ligands, tools that have been trained on elution data (NetMHCpan4 and MixMHCpred) shows better accuracy than pure binding affinity predictor. The variability of false prediction rate is considerable among HLA types and datasets. Finally, structure-based predictor of Rosetta FlexPepDock is less optimal compared to the machine learning approaches. With our benchmarking of MHC-binding and MHC-elution predictors using a comprehensive metrics, a unbiased view for establishing best practice of T-cell epitope predictions is presented, facilitating future development of methods in immunogenomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.