Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30408025›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2018

Harnessing olfactory bulb oscillations to perform fully brain-based sleep-scoring and real-time monitoring of anaesthesia depth.

Sophie Bagur, Marie Masako Lacroix, Gaëtan de Lavilléon, Julie M Lefort, Hélène Geoffroy, Karim Benchenane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Geometry of Layer 2/3 Cortical Sound Processing in Slow Wave Sleep.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Selective Modulation of Fear Memory in Non-Rapid Eye Movement Sleep.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Reciprocal relationships between sleep and smell.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sophie BagurTeam Memory, Oscillations and Brain States (MOBs), Plasticité du cerveau, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL University, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4375-1838
Marie Masako LacroixTeam Memory, Oscillations and Brain States (MOBs), Plasticité du cerveau, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL University, 75005 Paris, France.
Gaëtan de LavilléonTeam Memory, Oscillations and Brain States (MOBs), Plasticité du cerveau, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL University, 75005 Paris, France.
Julie M LefortTeam Memory, Oscillations and Brain States (MOBs), Plasticité du cerveau, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL University, 75005 Paris, France.
Hélène GeoffroyTeam Memory, Oscillations and Brain States (MOBs), Plasticité du cerveau, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL University, 75005 Paris, France.
Karim BenchenaneTeam Memory, Oscillations and Brain States (MOBs), Plasticité du cerveau, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL University, 75005 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time tracking of vigilance states related to both sleep or anaesthesia has been a goal for over a century. However, sleep scoring cannot currently be performed with brain signals alone, despite the deep neuromodulatory transformations that accompany sleep state changes. Therefore, at heart, the operational distinction between sleep and wake is that of immobility and movement, despite numerous situations in which this one-to-one mapping fails. Here we demonstrate, using local field potential (LFP) recordings in freely moving mice, that gamma (50-70 Hz) power in the olfactory bulb (OB) allows for clear classification of sleep and wake, thus providing a brain-based criterion to distinguish these two vigilance states without relying on motor activity. Coupled with hippocampal theta activity, it allows the elaboration of a sleep scoring algorithm that relies on brain activity alone. This method reaches over 90% homology with classical methods based on muscular activity (electromyography [EMG]) and video tracking. Moreover, contrary to EMG, OB gamma power allows correct discrimination between sleep and immobility in ambiguous situations such as fear-related freezing. We use the instantaneous power of hippocampal theta oscillation and OB gamma oscillation to construct a 2D phase space that is highly robust throughout time, across individual mice and mouse strains, and under classical drug treatment. Dynamic analysis of trajectories within this space yields a novel characterisation of sleep/wake transitions: whereas waking up is a fast and direct transition that can be modelled by a ballistic trajectory, falling asleep is best described as a stochastic and gradual state change. Finally, we demonstrate that OB oscillations also allow us to track other vigilance states. Non-REM (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep can be distinguished with high accuracy based on beta (10-15 Hz) power. More importantly, we show that depth of anaesthesia can be tracked in real time using OB gamma power. Indeed, the gamma power predicts and anticipates the motor response to stimulation both in the steady state under constant anaesthetic and dynamically during the recovery period. Altogether, this methodology opens the avenue for multi-timescale characterisation of brain states and provides an unprecedented window onto levels of vigilance.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnesthesiaAnimalsBrainElectroencephalographyElectromyographyHippocampusMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOlfactory BulbSleepSleep, REMSleep StagesWakefulness

Identifiers

PMID30408025
PMCPMC6224033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.