Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30407901›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2019

A New Standard DNA Damage (SDD) Data Format.

J Schuemann, A L McNamara, J W Warmenhoven, N T Henthorn, K J Kirkby, M J Merchant, S Ingram, H Paganetti, K D Held, J Ramos-Mendez and 45 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

55 authors.

J Schuemanna   Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
A L McNamaraa   Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
J W Warmenhovenb   Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
N T Henthornb   Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
K J Kirkbyb   Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
M J Merchantb   Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
S Ingramb   Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
H Paganettia   Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
K D Helda   Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Ramos-Mendezc   Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
B Faddegonc   Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
J Perld   SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California.
D T Goodheade   Medical Research Council, Harwell, United Kingdom.
I Plantef   KBRwyle, Houston, Texas.
H Rabusg   Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany.
H Nettelbeckg   Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany.
W Friedlandh   Task Group 6.2 "Computational Micro- and Nanodosimetry", European Radiation Dosimetry Group e.V., Neuherberg, Germany.
P Kundráti   Institute of Radiation Protection, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
A Ottolenghij   Physics Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
G Baioccoh   Task Group 6.2 "Computational Micro- and Nanodosimetry", European Radiation Dosimetry Group e.V., Neuherberg, Germany.
S Barbierih   Task Group 6.2 "Computational Micro- and Nanodosimetry", European Radiation Dosimetry Group e.V., Neuherberg, Germany.
M Dingfelderk   Department of Physics, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
S Incertil   CNRS, IN2P3, CENBG, UMR 5797, F-33170 Gradignan, France.
C Villagrasah   Task Group 6.2 "Computational Micro- and Nanodosimetry", European Radiation Dosimetry Group e.V., Neuherberg, Germany.
M Buenon   Institut de Radioprotection et Sûreté Nucléaire, F-92262 Fontenay aux Roses Cedex, France.
M A Bernalo   Applied Physics Department, Gleb Wataghin Institute of Physics, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
S Guatellip   Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
D Sakatap   Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
J M C Brownq   Department of Radiation Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Z Francisr   Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
I Kyriakous   Medical Physics Laboratory, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece.
N Lampel   CNRS, IN2P3, CENBG, UMR 5797, F-33170 Gradignan, France.
F Ballarinij   Physics Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
M P Carantej   Physics Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
M Davídkováu   Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, Řež, Czech Republic.
V Štěpánu   Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, Řež, Czech Republic.
X Jiav   Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
F A Cucinottaw   Health Physics and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada.
R Schultex   Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California.
R D Stewarty   Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
D J Carlsonz   Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
S Galeraa   Medical Radiation Science Group, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom.
Z Kuncicbb   School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
S Lacombecc   Institut des Sciences Moléculaires d'Orsay (UMR 8214) University Paris-Sud, CNRS, University Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France.
J Milligandd   Retired.
S H Choee   Department of Radiation Physics and Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
G Sawakuchiee   Department of Radiation Physics and Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
T Inaniwaff   Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.
T Satogg   Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Tokai 319-1196, Japan.
W Lii   Institute of Radiation Protection, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
A V Solov'yovii   MBN Research Center, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
E Surdutovichjj   Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan.
M Durantekk   GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Darmstadt, Germany.
K M Prisell   Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
S J McMahonll   Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Funding

MDACC Clinical and Research Physics SupportU19CA021239 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SHIH, HELEN A · 2014 to 2018
$11.2M
TOPAS - nBio, a Monte Carlo tool for radiation biology researchR01CA187003 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SCHUEMANN, JAN PATRICK OSCAR · 2015 to 2024
$4.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA187003NCI NIH HHS U19 CA021239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of radiation-induced cellular damage has greatly improved over the past few decades. Despite this progress, there are still many obstacles to fully understand how radiation interacts with biologically relevant cellular components, such as DNA, to cause observable end points such as cell killing. Damage in DNA is identified as a major route of cell killing. One hurdle when modeling biological effects is the difficulty in directly comparing results generated by members of different research groups. Multiple Monte Carlo codes have been developed to simulate damage induction at the DNA scale, while at the same time various groups have developed models that describe DNA repair processes with varying levels of detail. These repair models are intrinsically linked to the damage model employed in their development, making it difficult to disentangle systematic effects in either part of the modeling chain. These modeling chains typically consist of track-structure Monte Carlo simulations of the physical interactions creating direct damages to DNA, followed by simulations of the production and initial reactions of chemical species causing so-called "indirect" damages. After the induction of DNA damage, DNA repair models combine the simulated damage patterns with biological models to determine the biological consequences of the damage. To date, the effect of the environment, such as molecular oxygen (normoxic vs. hypoxic), has been poorly considered. We propose a new standard DNA damage (SDD) data format to unify the interface between the simulation of damage induction in DNA and the biological modeling of DNA repair processes, and introduce the effect of the environment (molecular oxygen or other compounds) as a flexible parameter. Such a standard greatly facilitates inter-model comparisons, providing an ideal environment to tease out model assumptions and identify persistent, underlying mechanisms. Through inter-model comparisons, this unified standard has the potential to greatly advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of radiation-induced DNA damage and the resulting observable biological effects when radiation parameters and/or environmental conditions change.

Indexed as

DNA DamageComputer SimulationDNA RepairLinear Energy TransferModels, TheoreticalMonte Carlo Method

Identifiers

PMID30407901
PMCPMC6407706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.