Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30407845›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2019

MR imaging of spinal haematoma: a pictorial review.

Heather Kate Moriarty, Roisin O Cearbhaill, Peter D Moriarty, Emma Stanley, Leo P Lawler, Eoin C Kavanagh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpreting acute postoperative MRI after lumbar spinal fusion: a practical framework for clinical decision-making.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cervical epidural hematoma: a case series highlighting uncommon causes.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heather Kate Moriarty1 Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland.
Roisin O Cearbhaill2 Department of Neurosurgery, Beaumont Hospital , Dublin , Ireland.
Peter D Moriarty3 Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery, Cork University Hospital , Cork , Ireland.
Emma Stanley1 Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland.
Leo P Lawler1 Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland.
Eoin C Kavanagh1 Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal haematoma is a rare occurrence, however has the potential to cause significant spinal injury and morbidity. MRI is the gold-standard of investigation, and urgent imaging is required for early diagnosis and treatment to ensure best patient outcomes. We present a pictorial review demonstrating the imaging features of spinal haematoma based on meningeal space assignment; epidural, subdural, subarachnoid, intramedullary and a combination of these locations. In this review, we summarise the literature and imaging findings of spinal haematoma on MRI. Particular imaging features which help to differentiate between haematoma in the different spinal meningeal compartments are discussed below.

Indexed as

HematomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal CordSpinal Cord Diseases

Identifiers

PMID30407845
PMCPMC6541191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.