ArticleMolecular oral microbiology2019
Biofilm-induced profiles of immune response gene expression by oral epithelial cells.
Article in Molecular oral microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Loss of salivary agglutinin induces changes in the salivary microbiome and accelerates development of oral cancer.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Variation of Gene Expression and Methylation Profiling in Gingival and Tongue Cancers.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Anti-Inflammatory and Osteogenic Effect of Phloroglucinol-Enriched Whey Protein Isolate Fibrillar Coating on Ti-6Al-4V Alloy.Polymers · 2025Article
- Microbial functional pathways based on metatranscriptomic profiling enable effective saliva-based health assessments for precision wellness.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Host-microbe interactions in chronic rhinosinusitis biofilms and models for investigation.Biofilm · 2023Review
- Imaging biofilms using fluorescenceFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
- Oral Microbiota Variation: A Risk Factor for Development and Poor Prognosis of Esophageal Cancer.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Review
- Role of Porphyromonas gingivalis in oral and orodigestive squamous cell carcinoma.Periodontology 2000 · 2022Review
- E-Cigarette Aerosol Exposure Favors the Growth and Colonization of Oral Streptococcus mutans Compared to Commensal Streptococci.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- The dental plaque biofilm matrix.Periodontology 2000 · 2021Review
- LuxS quorum sensing system and biofilm formation of oral microflora: A short review article.The Saudi dental journal · 2021Review
- Two CD9 tetraspanin family members of Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus): characterization and comparative analysis of the anti-infectious immune function.Veterinary research · 2021Article
- Article
- Biofilm growth and IL-8 & TNF-α-inducing properties of Candida albicans in the presence of oral gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.BMC microbiology · 2020Article
- In Vitro Effects ofCells · 2020Article
- Biliary Tract Carcinogenesis Model Based on Bile Metaproteomics.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Article
- Commensal and Pathogenic Biofilms Alter Toll-Like Receptor Signaling in Reconstructed Human Gingiva.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the oral epithelial immunotranscriptome response patterns modulated by oral bacterial planktonic or biofilm challenge. We assessed gene expression patterns when epithelial cells were challenged with a multispecies biofilm composed of Streptococcus gordonii, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Porphyromonas gingivalis representing a type of periodontopathic biofilm compared to challenge with the same species of planktonic bacteria. Of the 579 human immunology genes, a substantial signal of the epithelial cells was observed to 181 genes. Biofilm challenged stimulated significant elevations compared to planktonic bacteria for IL32, IL8, CD44, B2M, TGFBI, NFKBIA, IL1B, CD59, IL1A, CCL20 representing the top 10 signals comprising 55% of the overall signal for the epithelial cell responses. Levels of PLAU, CD9, IFITM1, PLAUR, CD24, TNFSF10, and IL1RN were all elevated by each of the planktonic bacterial challenge vs the biofilm responses. While the biofilms up-regulated 123/579 genes (>2-fold), fewer genes were increased by the planktonic species (36 [S gordonii], 30 [F nucleatum], 44 [P gingivalis]). A wide array of immune genes were regulated by oral bacterial challenge of epithelial cells that would be linked to the local activity of innate and adaptive immune response components in the gingival tissues. Incorporating bacterial species into a structured biofilm dramatically altered the number and level of genes expressed. Additionally, a specific set of genes were significantly decreased with the multispecies biofilms suggesting that some epithelial cell biologic pathways are down-regulated when in contact with this type of pathogenic biofilm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.