Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30407718›Full record

ArticleCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2019

Safety of catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation on branch renal arteries in a porcine model.

Atsushi Sakaoka, Serge D Rousselle, Hitomi Hagiwara, Armando Tellez, Brad Hubbard, Kenichi Sakakura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Safety of catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation on branch renal arteries in a porcine model.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Atsushi SakaokaEvaluation Center, R&D Administration and Promotion Department, Terumo Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3656-8277
Serge D RousselleAlizée Pathology, LLC, Thurmont, Maryland.
Hitomi HagiwaraEvaluation Center, R&D Administration and Promotion Department, Terumo Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan.
Armando TellezAlizée Pathology, LLC, Thurmont, Maryland.
Brad HubbardSynchrony Labs, LLC, Durham, North Carolina.
Kenichi SakakuraDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3566-0394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to investigate the safety of radiofrequency (RF)-renal denervation (RDN) on branch renal arteries (RAs) in a porcine model.

backgroundThe efficacy of RF-RDN was enhanced by treatment of the branch RA, in addition to the main RA. However, there are concerns regarding the safety of RF-RDN on branch RA because of their smaller diameter and proximity to the kidney.

methodsRF was delivered to 24 RA from 12 swine. A total of 8 RA from 4 swine were untreated. Treated RA were examined by angiography and histopathology at 7, 30, and 90 days. Serum creatinine concentration, biophysical parameters during RF delivery, and renal norepinephrine concentration were also assessed.

resultsAngiography revealed minimal late lumen loss and diameter stenosis in the main and branch RA at any time point. There was no change in serum creatinine after RF-RDN. Histopathologically, no augmentation of medial damage or neointimal formation was found in branch RA compared with main RA. No or minimal damage to surrounding tissues including the kidneys, ureters, lymph nodes, and muscles was observed at any time point in both the main and branch RA. Equivalent electrode temperature in the main and branch RA was achieved by automatic adjustment of output power by the generator. The renal norepinephrine concentration was significantly lower in the treated group compared with the untreated group.

conclusionsRF-RDN on branch RA was safe in a porcine model, with stenosis-free healing of treated arteries and negligible kidney damage at 7, 30, and 90 days.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationAnimalsBiomarkersCreatinineFemaleModels, AnimalNorepinephrineRenal ArterySus scrofaSympathectomyTime FactorsWound HealingBiomarkersCreatinineNorepinephrinebranch renal arterypathologypreclinical studyradiofrequencyrenal denervation

Identifiers

PMID30407718
PMCPMC6587466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.