Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30407717›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2019

Resequencing of cv CRI-12 family reveals haplotype block inheritance and recombination of agronomically important genes in artificial selection.

Xuke Lu, Xiaoqiong Fu, Delong Wang, Junyi Wang, Xiugui Chen, Meirong Hao, Junjuan Wang, Kyle A Gervers, Lixue Guo, Shuai Wang and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A Calmodulin-Like Gene (Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  12. Advances and Challenges in the Breeding of Salt-Tolerant Rice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. EST-SNP Study ofGenes · 2020
    Article
  14. Breeding crops by design for future agriculture.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Xuke LuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4757-1057
Xiaoqiong FuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Delong WangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Junyi WangHangzhou 1 Gene Technology CO., LTD, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiugui ChenState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Meirong HaoHangzhou 1 Gene Technology CO., LTD, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Junjuan WangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Kyle A GerversCrop Germplasm Research Unit, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), College Station, TX, USA.
Lixue GuoState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Shuai WangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Zujun YinState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Weili FanState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Chunwei ShiHangzhou 1 Gene Technology CO., LTD, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaoge WangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Jun PengState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Chao ChenState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Ruifeng CuiState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Na ShuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Binglei ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Mingge HanState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Xiaojie ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
Min MuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.
John Z YuCrop Germplasm Research Unit, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), College Station, TX, USA.
Wuwei YeState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory for Cotton Genetic Improvement, Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture, Anyang, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although efforts have been taken to exploit diversity for yield and quality improvements, limited progress on using beneficial alleles in domesticated and undomesticated cotton varieties is limited. Given the complexity and limited amount of genomic information since the completion of four cotton genomes, characterizing significant variations and haplotype block inheritance under artificial selection has been challenging. Here we sequenced Gossypium hirsutum L. cv CRI-12 (the cotton variety with the largest acreage in China), its parental cultivars, and progeny cultivars, which were bred by the different institutes in China. In total, 3.3 million SNPs were identified and 118, 126 and 176 genes were remarkably correlated with Verticillium wilt, salinity and drought tolerance in CRI-12, respectively. Transcriptome-wide analyses of gene expression, and functional annotations, have provided support for the identification of genes tied to these tolerances. We totally discovered 58 116 haplotype blocks, among which 23 752 may be inherited and 1029 may be recombined under artificial selection. This survey of genetic diversity identified loci that may have been subject to artificial selection and documented the haplotype block inheritance and recombination, shedding light on the genetic mechanism of artificial selection and guiding breeding efforts for the genetic improvement of cotton.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceGenes, PlantGenome, PlantGossypiumHaplotypesPlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait, HeritableRecombination, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAartificial selectionCRI-12 familyhaplotype blockinheritance and recombinationSNPs

Identifiers

PMID30407717
PMCPMC6587942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.