Trial reportNeurogastroenterology and motility2019
Detecting the effects of a standardized meal challenge on small bowel motility with MRI in prepared and unprepared bowel.
Trial report in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detecting the effects of a standardized meal challenge on small bowel motility with MRI in prepared and unprepared bowel.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2019Trial
- Evaluation of pan-alimentary MRI examinations: intrasubject variability and examination duration.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Postprandial Changes in Thoracic Aortic Flow Detected by 4D Flow MRI May Influence Study Results.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- The CONTEXT trial: Real world clinical use of GIQuant-a motility MRI based activity biomarker for small bowel Crohn's disease.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2026Article
- Effects of patient and imaging factors on small bowel motility scores derived from deep learning-based segmentation of cine MRI.European radiology · 2025Article
- Quantitative Analysis of Small Intestinal Motility in 3D Cine-MRI Using Centerline-Aware Motion Estimation.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (qMRI) of the Small Bowel in Crohn's Disease: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Impact of bowel dilation on small bowel motility measurements with cine-MRI: assessment of two quantification techniques.BJR open · 2022Article
- Fasted and fed small bowel motility patterns at cine-MRI in chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2021Article
- Serum Scoring and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Intestinal Failure-Associated Liver Disease: A Feasibility Study.Nutrients · 2020Article
- Assessment of fasted and fed gastrointestinal contraction frequencies in healthy subjects using continuously tagged MRI.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMRI is increasingly used to evaluate small bowel contractility. The objective of this study was to validate a clinically practical stimulation test (300-kcal meal) for small bowel motility.
methodsThirty-one healthy subjects underwent dynamic MRI to capture global small bowel motility after ±10h fasting, of which 15 underwent bowel preparation consisting of 1 L 2.5% mannitol solution and 16 did not. Each subject underwent (1) a baseline motility scan (2) a food challenge (3) a post-challenge scan, and (4) second post-challenge scan (after ±20 minutes). This protocol was repeated within 2 weeks. Motility was quantified using a validated motility assessment technique. KEY
resultsMotility in prepared subjects at baseline was significantly higher than motility in unprepared subjects (0.36 AU vs 0.18 AU, P < 0.001). In the prepared group, the food challenge produced an 8% increase in motility (P = 0.33) while in the unprepared subjects a significant increase of 30% was observed (P < 0.001). Responses to food remained insignificant (P = 0.21) and significant (P = 0.003), for the prepared and unprepared subjects, respectively, ±20 minutes post food challenge. These results were confirmed in the repeated scan session. CONCLUSION & INFERENCES: A significant response to a 300-kcal meal was measured within 10 minutes in unprepared bowel, supporting the clinical use of this challenge to provoke and assess motility changes. A caloric challenge did not produce an observable increase in motility in mannitol prepared subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.