Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30407694›Full record

Trial reportNeurogastroenterology and motility2019

Detecting the effects of a standardized meal challenge on small bowel motility with MRI in prepared and unprepared bowel.

Catharina S de Jonge, Alex Menys, Kyra L van Rijn, Arjan J Bredenoord, Aart J Nederveen, Jaap Stoker

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Catharina S de JongeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3921-0895
Alex MenysCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London (UCL), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6088-0730
Kyra L van RijnDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arjan J BredenoordDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aart J NederveenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap StokerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLMott MacDonald (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

AMC foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMRI is increasingly used to evaluate small bowel contractility. The objective of this study was to validate a clinically practical stimulation test (300-kcal meal) for small bowel motility.

methodsThirty-one healthy subjects underwent dynamic MRI to capture global small bowel motility after ±10h fasting, of which 15 underwent bowel preparation consisting of 1 L 2.5% mannitol solution and 16 did not. Each subject underwent (1) a baseline motility scan (2) a food challenge (3) a post-challenge scan, and (4) second post-challenge scan (after ±20 minutes). This protocol was repeated within 2 weeks. Motility was quantified using a validated motility assessment technique. KEY

resultsMotility in prepared subjects at baseline was significantly higher than motility in unprepared subjects (0.36 AU vs 0.18 AU, P < 0.001). In the prepared group, the food challenge produced an 8% increase in motility (P = 0.33) while in the unprepared subjects a significant increase of 30% was observed (P < 0.001). Responses to food remained insignificant (P = 0.21) and significant (P = 0.003), for the prepared and unprepared subjects, respectively, ±20 minutes post food challenge. These results were confirmed in the repeated scan session. CONCLUSION & INFERENCES: A significant response to a 300-kcal meal was measured within 10 minutes in unprepared bowel, supporting the clinical use of this challenge to provoke and assess motility changes. A caloric challenge did not produce an observable increase in motility in mannitol prepared subjects.

Indexed as

AdultFastingFemaleGastrointestinal MotilityHumansIntestine, SmallMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMealsdynamic MRIfood challengemotilitysmall bowelstimulation test

Identifiers

PMID30407694
PMCPMC7379305
OpenAlexW2900440561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.