Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30407557›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2019

Update of the FANTOM web resource: expansion to provide additional transcriptome atlases.

Marina Lizio, Imad Abugessaisa, Shuhei Noguchi, Atsushi Kondo, Akira Hasegawa, Chung Chau Hon, Michiel de Hoon, Jessica Severin, Shinya Oki, Yoshihide Hayashizaki and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marina LizioRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Imad AbugessaisaRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Shuhei NoguchiRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Atsushi KondoRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Akira HasegawaRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Chung Chau HonRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Michiel de HoonRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Jessica SeverinRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Shinya OkiDepartment of Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Yoshihide HayashizakiRIKEN Preventive Medicine and Diagnosis Innovation Program, Wako, Saitama 351-0198 Japan.
Piero CarninciRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Takeya KasukawaRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Hideya KawajiRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The FANTOM web resource (http://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/) was developed to provide easy access to the data produced by the FANTOM project. It contains the most complete and comprehensive sets of actively transcribed enhancers and promoters in the human and mouse genomes. We determined the transcription activities of these regulatory elements by CAGE (Cap Analysis of Gene Expression) for both steady and dynamic cellular states in all major and some rare cell types, consecutive stages of differentiation and responses to stimuli. We have expanded the resource by employing different assays, such as RNA-seq, short RNA-seq and a paired-end protocol for CAGE (CAGEscan), to provide new angles to study the transcriptome. That yielded additional atlases of long noncoding RNAs, miRNAs and their promoters. We have also expanded the CAGE analysis to cover rat, dog, chicken, and macaque species for a limited number of cell types. The CAGE data obtained from human and mouse were reprocessed to make them available on the latest genome assemblies. Here, we report the recent updates of both data and interfaces in the FANTOM web resource.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticInternetAnimalsCell DifferentiationChickensDogsGene Expression RegulationGenomeGenomicsHumansMiceMicroRNAsPromoter Regions, GeneticRatsRNA, Long NoncodingTranscriptomeMicroRNAsRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID30407557
PMCPMC6323950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.