ArticleJournal of radiation research2019
Monte Carlo modeling of a 60Co MRI-guided radiotherapy system on Geant4 and experimental verification of dose calculation under a magnetic field of 0.35 T.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the role of plan complexity metrics in online adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Dosimetric Effects of Air Cavities for MRI-Guided Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy (MRgART) of Prostate Bed after Radical Prostatectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our purpose was to establish the commissioning procedure of Monte Carlo modeling on a magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy system (MRIdian, Viewray Inc.) under a magnetic field of 0.345 T through experimental measurements. To do this, we sought (i) to assess the depth-dose and lateral profiles generated by the Geant4 using either EBT3 film or the BJR-25 data; (ii) to assess the calculation accuracy under a magnetic field of 0.345 T. The radius of the electron trajectory caused by the electron return effect (ERE) in a vacuum was obtained both by the Geant4 and the theoretical methods. The surface dose on the phantom was calculated and compared with that obtained from the film measurements. The dose distribution in a phantom having two air gaps was calculated and measured with EBT 3 film. (i) The difference of depth-dose profile generated by the Geant4 from the BJR-25 data was 0.0 ± 0.8% and 0.3 ± 1.5% for field sizes of 4.5 and 27.3 cm2, respectively. Lateral dose profiles generated by Geant4 agreed well with those generated from the EBT3 film data. (ii) The radius of the electron trajectory generated by Geant4 agreed well with the theoretical values. A maximum of ~50% reduction of the surface dose under a magnetic field of 0.345 T was observed due to elimination of the electron contamination caused by the magnetic field, as determined by both the film measurements and the Geant4. Changes in the dose distributions in the air gaps caused by the ERE were observed on the Geant4 and in the film measurements. Gamma analysis (3%/3 mm) showed a pass rate of 95.1%. Commissioning procedures for the MRI-guided radiotherapy system on the Geant4 were established, and we concluded that the Geant4 had provided high calculation accuracy under a magnetic field of 0.345 T.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.