Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30407529›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2019

BioSamples database: an updated sample metadata hub.

Mélanie Courtot, Luca Cherubin, Adam Faulconbridge, Daniel Vaughan, Matthew Green, David Richardson, Peter Harrison, Patricia L Whetzel, Helen Parkinson, Tony Burdett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An approach to making life sciences FAIR-FAIR-DS as a tool for Aspergillus fumigatus.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mélanie CourtotEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.
Luca CherubinEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.
Adam FaulconbridgeEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.
Daniel VaughanEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.
Matthew GreenEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.
David RichardsonEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.
Peter HarrisonEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.
Patricia L WhetzelEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.
Helen ParkinsonEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.
Tony BurdettEMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 201535/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The BioSamples database at EMBL-EBI provides a central hub for sample metadata storage and linkage to other EMBL-EBI resources. BioSamples has recently undergone major changes, both in terms of data content and supporting infrastructure. The data content has more than doubled from around 2 million samples in 2014 to just over 5 million samples in 2018. Fast, reciprocal data exchange was fully established between sister Biosample databases and other INSDC partners, enabling a worldwide common representation and centralization of sample metadata. The BioSamples platform has been upgraded to accommodate anticipated increases in the number of submissions via GA4GH driver projects such as the Human Cell Atlas and the EGA, as well as from mirroring of NCBI dbGaP data. The BioSamples database is now the authoritative repository for all INSDC sample metadata, an ELIXIR Deposition Database for Biomolecular Data and the EMBL-EBI sample metadata hub. To support faster turnaround for sample submission, and to increase scalability and resilience, we have upgraded the BioSamples database backend storage, APIs and user interface. Finally, the website has been redesigned to allow search and retrieval of records based on specific filters, such as 'disease' or 'organism'. These changes are targeted at answering current use cases as well as providing functionalities for future emerging and anticipated developments. Availability: The BioSamples database is freely available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biosamples. Content is distributed under the EMBL-EBI Terms of Use available at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/about/terms-of-use.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksDatabases, GeneticDatabases, Nucleic AcidComputational BiologyGenomicsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalInternetMetadataUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID30407529
PMCPMC6323949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.