Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30407074›Full record

ArticleAstrobiology2019

Wind-Driven Saltation: An Overlooked Challenge for Life on Mars.

E N Bak, M G Larsen, S K Jensen, P Nørnberg, R Moeller, K Finster

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Astrobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Planetary Protection and the astrobiological exploration of Mars: Proactive steps in moving forward.Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E N Bak1 Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University , Aarhus, Denmark .
M G Larsen1 Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University , Aarhus, Denmark .
S K Jensen2 Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University , Aarhus, Denmark .
P Nørnberg1 Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University , Aarhus, Denmark .
R Moeller3 Institute of Aerospace Medicine , Radiation Biology Department, Space Microbiology Research Group, German Aerospace Center (DLR e.V.), Cologne (Köln), Germany .
K Finster1 Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University , Aarhus, Denmark .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated that the martian surface environment is hostile to life because of its rough radiation climate and the reactive chemistry of the regolith. Physical processes such as erosion and transport of mineral particles by wind-driven saltation have hitherto not been considered as a life hazard. We report a series of experiments where bacterial endospores (spores of Bacillus subtilis) were exposed to a simulated saltating martian environment. We observed that 50% of the spores that are known to be highly resistant to radiation and oxidizing chemicals were destroyed by saltation-mediated abrasion within one minute. Scanning electron micrographs show that the spores were not only damaged by abrasion but were eradicated during the saltation process. We suggest that abrasion mediated by wind-driven saltation should be included as a factor that defines the habitability of the martian surface environment. The process may efficiently protect the martian surface from forward contamination with terrestrial microbial life-forms. Abrasion mediated by wind-driven saltation should also be considered as a major challenge to indigenous martian surface life if it exists/existed.

Indexed as

ExobiologyExtraterrestrial EnvironmentMarsWindBacillus subtilisColony Count, MicrobialMineralsPressureSilicatesSpores, BacterialbasaltMineralsSilicatesErosionForward contaminationHabitabilityMicroorganisms.SaltationSpores

Identifiers

PMID30407074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.