Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30407058›Full record

ArticlePsychological services2019

Peer specialists: Exploring the influence of program structure on their emerging role.

Sharon McCarthy, Matthew Chinman, Chantele Mitchell-Miland, Russell K Schutt, Susan Zickmund, Marsha Langer Ellison

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological services, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Peer Support Activities for Veterans, Serving Members, and Their Families: Results of a Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sharon McCarthyVA Pittsburgh Health Care System.ORCID 0000-0002-7299-5129
Matthew ChinmanVA Pittsburgh Health Care System.
Chantele Mitchell-MilandVA Pittsburgh Health Care System.
Russell K SchuttDepartment of Sociology, University of Massachusetts Boston.ORCID 0000-0003-2569-6086
Susan ZickmundVA Salt Lake City Health Care System.
Marsha Langer EllisonEdith Nourse Rogers Veterans Hospital.ORCID 0000-0003-3535-4768
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · USEdith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital · USUniversity of Massachusetts Boston · USVA Salt Lake City Healthcare System · US

Funding

Improving Outcomes for Homeless Veterans with Peer SupportI01HX000584 · VA · EDITH NOURSE ROGERS MEMORIAL VETERANS HOSPITAL · PI ELLISON, MARSHA LANGER · 2013 to 2015
–
Health Services Research & Development I01 HX000584HSRD VA I01 HX000584Veterans Health Administration; Department of Veterans Affairs; Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research and Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although peer specialists play an increasing role in mental health service delivery, little is known about the best program structures for maximizing effective service delivery. This study reports on qualitative data from a larger study on peer specialists working with veterans in a Veterans Affairs homelessness program who were dually diagnosed with substance abuse and mental health concerns. Peer specialists were trained to deliver a recovery support program that is carried out weekly over 9 months and includes 20 structured sessions using a workbook and 20 unstructured, individually planned sessions. A sample of 20 veterans who were in the program were interviewed, along with 8 case managers and 3 peer specialists involved with the program. Interview transcripts were coded for 3 elements of program structure: time, content, and delivery. Results show that the program structure allowed flexibility for individual needs and that the workbook sessions were useful. Veterans ascribed value to the peer specialist delivering the content, compared to working alone on the material. Deliberate use of unstructured time with the peer specialist was seen as reducing isolation, increasing community integration, and encouraging recovery activities. The weekly, dependable nature of the program was seen as highly positive, whereas the 9-month duration was seen as too short. All groups interviewed expressed satisfaction with the program, although the case managers reported some reservations related to supervision and boundaries. Results suggest that, compared to completely structured or unstructured approaches that are common for peer specialist services, a middle level of structure for peer specialist programs could be a useful alternative. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Community IntegrationMental Health ServicesPeer GroupSpecializationAdultAgedFemaleHumansIll-Housed PersonsMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans

Identifiers

PMID30407058
PMCPMC6506405
OpenAlexW2899832615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.