Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30407053›Full record

ArticlePsychological services2019

Perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation of peer support in Veterans Health Administration Primary Care-Mental Health Integration settings.

Robyn L Shepardson, Emily M Johnson, Kyle Possemato, Danielle Arigo, Jennifer S Funderburk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological services, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Increasing access to behavioral health care: Examples of task shifting in two U.S. government health care systems.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Peer support and psychedelics.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robyn L ShepardsonCenter for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse VA Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0001-6954-5920
Emily M JohnsonCenter for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse VA Medical Center.
Kyle PossematoCenter for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse VA Medical Center.
Danielle ArigoDepartment of Psychology, The University of Scranton.
Jennifer S FunderburkCenter for Integrated Healthcare, Syracuse VA Medical Center.
SUNY Upstate Medical University · USUniversity of Scranton · US

Funding

HSRD VA IK2 HX002107Syracuse VA Medical Center; Center for Integrated HealthcareVeterans Health Administration; Department of Veterans Affairs; Health Services Research and Development Service
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer support is increasingly recognized as consistent with the goals of integrated primary care and is being implemented in primary care settings as a patient-centered approach that increases patient activation and access to care. Within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), peer support specialists (PSSs) have traditionally worked in specialty mental health settings and only recently started working in Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI) settings. Prior research has identified implementation challenges, such as role confusion, when integrating peer support into new settings. In this qualitative descriptive study, we conducted semistructured interviews on perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing peer support in PC-MHI with 25 key stakeholders (7 PSSs, 6 PSS supervisors, 6 PC-MHI providers, and 6 primary care providers). We used conventional content analysis to code responses within four a priori implementation categories: barriers, initial facilitators, long-term facilitators, and leadership support. Perceived barriers included poor program functioning, inadequate administrative support, role confusion, and negative stakeholder attitudes. Key perceived facilitators of initializing and maintaining peer support were similar; administrative support was emphasized followed by program functioning and team cohesion. Stakeholder buy-in and access/visibility were perceived to facilitate initial implementation, whereas evidence of success was believed to facilitate maintenance. Stakeholder buy-in and administrative support were considered key elements of leadership support. Results were consistent with prior research from specialty mental health settings, but identified unique considerations for PC-MHI settings, particularly clarifying the PSS role based on local PC-MHI needs, obtaining buy-in, and facilitating integration of PSSs into the primary care team. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCounselingDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedMental Health ServicesPeer GroupSocial SupportHumansMental DisordersMental HealthPrimary Health CareUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans Health

Identifiers

PMID30407053
PMCPMC7905501
OpenAlexW2900418924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.