Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30406933›Full record

Observational studyUpdates in surgery2019

Laparoscopic resection of splenic flexure colon cancers: a retrospective multi-center study with 117 cases.

Michele Grieco, Diletta Cassini, Domenico Spoletini, Enrica Soligo, Emanuela Grattarola, Gianandrea Baldazzi, Silvio Testa, Massimo Carlini

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Updates in surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for left flexure colon cancer: A propensity score matched analysis from an international cohort.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michele GriecoGeneral Surgery Department, S. Eugenio Hospital, Piazzale dell'Umanesimo 10, 00144, Rome, Italy. dr.griecomichele@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1978-9772
Diletta CassiniGeneral and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Policlinico Abano Terme, Piazza C. Colombo 1, 35031, Abano Terme, PD, Italy.
Domenico SpoletiniGeneral Surgery Department, S. Eugenio Hospital, Piazzale dell'Umanesimo 10, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Enrica SoligoGeneral Surgery Department, S. Andrea Hospital, Corso M. Abbiate 21, 13100, Vercelli, Italy.
Emanuela GrattarolaStatistical and Big Data Department, Elis Consulting & Labs, Via S. Sandri 81, 00159, Rome, Italy.
Gianandrea BaldazziGeneral and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Policlinico Abano Terme, Piazza C. Colombo 1, 35031, Abano Terme, PD, Italy.
Silvio TestaGeneral Surgery Department, S. Andrea Hospital, Corso M. Abbiate 21, 13100, Vercelli, Italy.
Massimo CarliniGeneral Surgery Department, S. Eugenio Hospital, Piazzale dell'Umanesimo 10, 00144, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective is to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resections of splenic flexure colon cancers in three Italian high-volume centers. The laparoscopic resection of splenic flexure colon cancers is a challenging procedure and has not been completely standardized, mainly due to the technical difficulty, the arduous identification of major blood vessels, and the problems associated with anastomosis construction. In this retrospective cohort observational study, a consecutive series of patients treated in three Italian high-volume centers with elective laparoscopic resection of the splenic flexure for cancer is analyzed. The observational period was from January 2008 to August 2017. Patient demographics and clinical features, operative data, and short- and long-term outcomes were prospectively recorded in a specific database and were retrospectively analyzed. During the observation period, 117 patients were selected. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 15 patients (12.8%). Of 102 complete laparoscopic procedures, multi-visceral resection was performed in 13 cases (12.7%). Postoperative surgical complications occurred in 13 patients (12.7%), with 3 cases of anastomotic leak (2.9%) and 3 cases of re-operation (2.9%). The postoperative mortality in this population was null. The 5-year overall survival rate was 84.3%, and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 87.8%. Laparoscopic resection of the splenic flexure is feasible and safe in high-volume centers. Compared to the results of other laparoscopic colonic resections, the short- and long-term outcomes are similar, but the conversion rate is higher.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomotic LeakCohort StudiesColonic NeoplasmsConversion to Open SurgeryDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateColon cancerLaparoscopic resectionSplenic flexure

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.