SynthesisClinical drug investigation2019
Efficacy and Safety of Eltrombopag for Aplastic Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical drug investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- American Society of Hematology 2026 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of severe and very severe acquired aplastic anemia.Blood advances · 2026Guideline
- Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapy combined with eltrombopag for severe aplastic anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of Eltrombopag with Immunosuppressive Therapy Versus Immunosuppressive Therapy Alone on Severe Aplastic Anaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2023Pooled it
- Eltrombopag in Combination with Rabbit Anti-thymocyte Globulin/Cyclosporine A in Immunosuppressive Therapy-naïve Patients with Aplastic Anemia in Japan.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Trial
- Article
- Studying the pathogenicity of 26 variants characterized in the first molecular analyses of Egyptian aplastic anemia patients.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Eltrombopag is effective in patients with relapse/refractory aplastic anemia-report from a single center in China.Annals of hematology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesEltrombopag seems to be effective in treating patients with aplastic anemia in several clinical trials. This paper aims to perform the first meta-analysis analyzing the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag for aplastic anemia.
methodsLiteratures were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, Web of Science, Cochrane, Wanfang, http://clinicaltrials.gov and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform search portal from establishment to July 2018. Using Stata statistical software version 12.0, subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted.
resultsThe overall hematologic response rate is 88% (95% CI 83-94%) for patients treated with eltrombopag plus immunosuppressive therapy, and 47% (95% CI 38-56%) for patients with refractory aplastic anemia using eltrombopag alone. Karyotype abnormality rates include an overall rate of 10% (95% CI 7-14%), a subtotal rate of 8% (95% CI 3-13%) for patients who are treated with eltrombopag plus immunosuppressive therapy without using antithymocyte globulin before, and a subtotal rate of 17% (95% CI 10-24%) for patients with refractory aplastic anemia treated with eltrombopag alone.
conclusionsWith different treatments and in different conditions eltrombopag showed a distinctive effect for aplastic anemia. However, clone evolution and adverse events were associated with treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.