Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30406835›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2019

Single-shot CT after wrist trauma: impact on detection accuracy and treatment of fractures.

Monique Brink, Arjan Steenbakkers, Micha Holla, Jacky de Rooy, Simon Cornelisse, Michael J Edwards, Mathias Prokop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Traditional radiography versus computed tomography to assess reduced distal radius fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. 3D wrist imaging - Is it time for superman to retire?Journal of clinical imaging science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monique BrinkDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, huispost 780, PO Box 5601, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. monique.brink@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4146-1052
Arjan SteenbakkersDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, huispost 780, PO Box 5601, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Micha HollaDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jacky de RooyDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, huispost 780, PO Box 5601, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Simon CornelisseDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michael J EdwardsDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mathias ProkopDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, huispost 780, PO Box 5601, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate accuracy of fracture detection and therapeutic impact of a single-shot CT protocol as a primary imaging tool in all patients with clinical suspicion of wrist injury, and evaluate the resulting impact on therapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a single-institution study on all patients with suspicion of fractures of the wrist and carpus. All patients underwent conventional radiography, thereafter single-shot wrist CT, and then 1-year follow-up. Physicians and radiologists prospectively scored likelihood of fracture presence on a five-point scale before and after CT. Three surgeons proposed a treatment regimen (functional, cast, reduction, or operative) based on clinical and radiological data, first with knowledge of conventional radiography, and then with knowledge of CT. The reference standard for fracture presence was based on all data. We performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses and calculated proportion of wrists with treatment changes due to CT imaging.

resultsNinety-eight patients participated (63% female, mean age 53, range, 18-87 years old) with 100 wrist CTs. Conventional radiography detected true-positive fractures in 45, and CT in 61 wrists. The areas under the curve for fracture detection were 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.93) for conventional radiography and 0.97 (95% CI 0.93-1.00) for CT. Treatment changed in 24 (24%, 95% CI 16-33%) - 31 (31%, 95% CI 23-41%) wrists, mostly involving a decrease in the rate of cast immobilization.

conclusionsSingle-shot CT in patients with clinical suspicion of wrist injury increases accuracy of fracture detection. This has a significant impact therapy in this population, mainly on cast immobilization.

trial registrationWe registered the study at www.clinicaltrials.gov , NL43482.091.13.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedWrist InjuriesCastsEmergency radiologyMultidetector computed tomographyRadiographySurgicalWounds and injuriesWrist Injuries

Identifiers

PMID30406835
PMCPMC6476997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.