Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30406828›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2020

Left inferior parietal and posterior temporal cortices mediate the effect of action observation on semantic processing of objects: evidence from rTMS.

Francesco De Bellis, Alfonso Magliacano, Laura Sagliano, Massimiliano Conson, Dario Grossi, Luigi Trojano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco De BellisLaboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.
Alfonso MagliacanoLaboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.
Laura SaglianoLaboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.
Massimiliano ConsonLaboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.
Dario GrossiLaboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.
Luigi TrojanoLaboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy. luigi.trojano@unicampania.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0328-9642
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies showed that motor information related to tool use (i.e., functional actions) could affect processing of objects semantic properties, whereas motor information related to grasping or moving tool (i.e., structural actions) cannot. However, little is known about the neural correlates mediating such interaction between motor and semantic information. Here, healthy participants performed a semantic judgment task requiring identification of semantic relations among objects, after observing a functional, a structural or a pointing action prime. In a within-subject design, during prime presentation the participants underwent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left supramarginal gyrus (SMG), the left posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG) or received sham stimulation. Results showed that in the sham condition observing functional actions (vs. structural and pointing actions) favoured processing of semantic relations based on function similarity (i.e., taxonomic relations), but not of relations based on co-occurrence within an event schema (i.e., thematic relations). Moreover, stimulation of both left SMG and pMTG abolished the effect of functional action primes worsening subsequent judgment about taxonomic relations, and this effect was greater after pMTG stimulation. rTMS did not affect processing of thematic semantic relations. We suggest that action observation triggers activation of functional motor information within left inferior parietal cortex, and that integration between functional motor and conceptual information in left temporal cortex could impact high-level semantic processing of tools.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleParietal LobeReaction TimeTemporal LobeTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30406828
OpenAlexW2899885232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.