ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2018
The Relevance of Irreversible Loss of Brain Function as a Reliable Sign of Death.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revise the Uniform Determination of Death Act to Align the Law With Practice Through Neurorespiratory Criteria.Neurology · 2022Article
- [Legal report].Rechtsmedizin (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Article
- Brain beats heart: a cross-cultural reflection.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2021Article
- [Brain death criterion and organ donation: current neuroscientific perspective].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2020Review
- [Diagnosis of irreversible loss of brain function ("brain death")-what is new?]Der Nervenarzt · 2019Review
- Spiritual Issues Should Be Considered.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Article
- In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Article
- Pertinent Points Need to Be More Convincingly Stated.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Article
- Is Irreversible Loss of Brain Function a Reliable Sign of Death?Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Article
- Metaphysical and Cultural Aspects.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is an ongoing need for clear explanation of the diagnostic entity called "irreversible loss of brain function" (ILBF), as the absolute reliability of this diagnosis and its significance continue to be widely misunderstood. The determination of death as an objective medical-scientific matter is often not clearly distinguished from various other aspects of death, such as its metaphysical and cultural aspects and the ways in which the living deal with the dead.
methodsThis review is based on articles retrieved by a selective literature search in the PubMed database and on guidelines and standardized diagnostic protocols from Germany and abroad.
resultsILBF can be caused by brain ischemia or anoxia or by any other type of brain disease or injury leading to an elevation of the intracranial pressure above the blood pressure and thereby to an arrest of the cerebral circulation. All situations in which brain function is merely reduced but not abolished, or only temporarily but not permanently abolished, can be clearly differentiated from ILBF through the use of standard diagnostic procedures as recommended in the relevant guidelines. Biological features that are common to all human beings underlie the medical criteria for the determination of death. The most important elements of the determination of death are irreversibility of the loss of brain function, loss of integration of bodily functions into a single living being, and loss of ability for any self-reflection or any independent interaction with the environment.
conclusionILBF is a reliable sign that a human being is dead. There has never been even one known case of incorrect determination of ILBF after proper application of the standardized diagnostic procedures that are set down in the guideline according to §16 of the German Transplantation Law.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.