ArticleApplied clinical informatics2018
An Electronic Medical Record in Pediatric Medical Education: Survey of Medical Students' Expectations and Experiences.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying necessary conditions for medical students' adoption of AI in the future practice: a survey study in Canada.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Evolving Medical Students' Digital Health Perceptions and Intentions: Insights From a Prepandemic and Postpandemic Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Primary Care Implementation of a Mandatory Prescription Drug Monitoring Program in New York City.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2022Article
- An Exploratory Study of Allied Health Students' Experiences of Electronic Medical Records During Placements.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Article
- Medical students' experience with accessing medical records in Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Improved Medical Student Engagement with EHR Documentation following the 2018 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Billing Changes.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
- Perception of Technology-Enhanced Learning by Medical Students: an Integrative Review.Medical science educator · 2020Review
- Scribes, EHRs, and Workflow Efficiencies in Allergy Practices.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study sought to quantitatively characterize medical students' expectations and experiences of an electronic health record (EHR) system in a hospital setting, and to examine perceived and actual impacts on learning.
methodsMedical students from July to December 2016 at a tertiary pediatric institution completed pre- and postrotation surveys evaluating their expectations and experience of using an EHR during a pediatric medicine rotation. Survey data included past technology experience, EHR accessibility, use of learning resources, and effect on learning outcomes and patient-clinician communication.
resultsStudents generally reported high computer self-efficacy (4.16 ± 0.752, mean ± standard deviation), were comfortable with learning new software (4.08 ± 0.771), and expected the EHR to enhance their overall learning (4.074 ± 0.722). Students anticipated the EHR to be easy to learn, use, and operate, which was consistent with their experience (pre 3.86 vs. post 3.90,
conclusionMedical students readily engaged with the EHR, recognized several advantages in clinical practice, and did not consider their ability to interact with patients was impaired. There was widespread consensus that the EHR enhanced their learning and clinician's feedback, but not to the degree they had expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.