Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30406610›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular engineering and technology2018

Validation and Extension of a Fluid-Structure Interaction Model of the Healthy Aortic Valve.

Anna Maria Tango, Jacob Salmonsmith, Andrea Ducci, Gaetano Burriesci

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hydrodynamic ex vivo analysis of valve-sparing techniques: assessment and comparison.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Immersed Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction.Annual review of fluid mechanics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna Maria TangoUCL Mechanical Engineering, Cardiovascular Engineering Laboratory, University College London, Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7JE, UK.
Jacob SalmonsmithUCL Mechanical Engineering, Cardiovascular Engineering Laboratory, University College London, Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7JE, UK.
Andrea DucciUCL Mechanical Engineering, Cardiovascular Engineering Laboratory, University College London, Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7JE, UK.
Gaetano BurriesciUCL Mechanical Engineering, Cardiovascular Engineering Laboratory, University College London, Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7JE, UK. g.burriesci@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9213-3403

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/14/39/30874British Heart Foundation PG/13/78/30400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe understanding of the optimum function of the healthy aortic valve is essential in interpreting the effect of pathologies in the region, and in devising effective treatments to restore the physiological functions. Still, there is no consensus on the operating mechanism that regulates the valve opening and closing dynamics. The aim of this study is to develop a numerical model that can support a better comprehension of the valve function and serve as a reference to identify the changes produced by specific pathologies and treatments.

methodsA numerical model was developed and adapted to accurately replicate the conditions of a previous in vitro investigation into aortic valve dynamics, performed by means of particle image velocimetry (PIV). The resulting velocity fields of the two analyses were qualitatively and quantitatively compared to validate the numerical model. In order to simulate more physiological operating conditions, this was then modified to overcome the main limitations of the experimental setup, such as the presence of a supporting stent and the non-physiological properties of the fluid and vessels.

resultsThe velocity fields of the initial model resulted in good agreement with those obtained from the PIV, with similar flow structures and about 90% of the computed velocities after valve opening within the standard deviation of the equivalent velocity measurements of the in vitro model. Once the experimental limitations were removed from the model, the valve opening dynamics changed substantially, with the leaflets opening into the sinuses to a much greater extent, enlarging the effective orifice area by 11%, and reducing greatly the vortical structures previously observed in proximity of the Valsalva sinuses wall.

conclusionsThe study suggests a new operating mechanism for the healthy aortic valve leaflets considerably different from what reported in the literature to date and largely more efficient in terms of hydrodynamic performance. This work also confirms the crucial role that numerical approaches, complemented with experimental findings, can play in overcoming some of the limitations inherent in experimental techniques, supporting the full understanding of complex physiological phenomena.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsModels, CardiovascularPatient-Specific ModelingAortic ValveBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansNumerical Analysis, Computer-AssistedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsStress, MechanicalFluid–structure-interaction (FSI)HaemodynamicsHeart valve dynamicsValsalva sinus

Identifiers

PMID30406610
PMCPMC6290709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.