Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30406596›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Antibiotics in hospital effluents: occurrence, contribution to urban wastewater, removal in a wastewater treatment plant, and environmental risk assessment.

Senar Aydin, Mehmet Emin Aydin, Arzu Ulvi, Havva Kilic

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Literature Review: Evaluation of Drug Removal Techniques in Municipal and Hospital Wastewater.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dynamics of antimicrobial resistance and susceptibility profile in full-scale hospital wastewater treatment plants.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Senar AydinEnvironmental Engineering Department, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey. sozcan@konya.edu.tr.
Mehmet Emin AydinEnvironmental Engineering Department, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Arzu UlviEnvironmental Engineering Department, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Havva KilicEnvironmental Engineering Department, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.

Funding

Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Turkish Academia of Sciences Awards for Outstanding Young Scientists (TÜBA-GEBIP).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study presented the occurrence of antibiotics in 16 different hospital effluents, the removal of antibiotics in urban wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), and the potential ecotoxicological risks of the effluent discharge on the aquatic ecosystem. The total concentration of antibiotics in hospital effluents was ranged from 21.2 ± 0.13 to 4886 ± 3.80 ng/L in summer and from 497 ± 3.66 to 322,735 ± 4.58 ng/L in winter. Azithromycin, clarithromycin, and ciprofloxacin were detected the highest concentrations among the investigated antibiotics. The total antibiotic load to the influent of the WWTP from hospitals was 3.46 g/day in summer and 303.2 g/day in winter. The total antibiotic contribution of hospitals to the influent of the WWTP was determined as 13% in summer and 28% in winter. The remaining 87% in summer and 72% in winter stems from the households. The total antibiotic removal by conventional physical and biological treatment processes was determined as 79% in summer, whereas it decreased to 36% in winter. When the environmental risk assessment was performed, azithromycin and clarithromycin in the effluent from the treatment plant in winter posed a high risk (RQ > 10) for the aquatic organisms (algae and fish) in the receiving environment. According to these results, the removal efficiency of antibiotics at the WWTP is inadequate and plant should be improved to remove antibiotics by advanced treatment processes.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinClarithromycinHospitalsRisk AssessmentSeasonsWaste Disposal, FluidWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinClarithromycinWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalAntibioticsEcotoxicological riskHospital wastewaterWastewater treatment plant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.