ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019
[Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy : Results and clinical experiences].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of intraoperative mitomycin C application at different concentrations on corneal densitometry after SmartSurfBMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Management of delayed corneal epithelial healing after refractive surgery: five case reports.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy-Review.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Advances in Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy versus Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Symmetric offset versus asymmetric offset ablation with transepithelial refractive keratectomy.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- SmartSurfEye and vision (London, England) · 2021Article
- Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratektomy after a Clear Lens Exchange.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze and assess the refractive outcome after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK). MATERIAL AND
methodsThe treatment was performed with the AMARIS 1050RS laser (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH, Kleinostheim, Germany). The method used an aspheric, aberration-neutral ablation profile and a standardized epithelial tissue removal of 55 µm in the center and 65 µm at a radius of 4 mm as well as SmartPulse technology. Only spherical and/or cylindrical refraction values were treated. Only untreated eyes with preoperative best corrected visual acuity equal to or better than 0.8 were included in the cohort. Follow-up examinations were performed after 1 and 4 days, after 1 and 3 months and after 1 year
resultsA total of 939 consecutive TransPRK laser treatments performed in the period from December 2014 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 34 years. The preoperative sphere had a range of -7.75 D up to +3.00 D and cylinders up to 5.00 D. The 3‑month follow-up control was performed in 728 eyes (77.5%). The predictability showed 89% of eyes within the target correction of less than 0.50 D and 99% of eyes less than 1.00 D. The astigmatic correction showed 91% of eyes with less than 0.50 D. In the safety 1% of eyes showed a visual loss of 2 Snellen lines because of haze. In 26 eyes (2.7%) follow-up treatment was performed with renewed TransPRK laser treatment, in the myopic cohort in 1.8% and in the hyperopic cohort in 13.0%. A residual refraction occurred in 20 eyes without haze and 6 eyes showed a residual refraction with signs of haze.
conclusionThe TransPRK led to similar results to intrastromal refractive surgery techniques but with fewer clinical complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.