Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30406365›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2019

Racial/ethnic disparities in inflammatory breast cancer survival in the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program.

Abdi T Gudina, Glenn Copeland, Amr S Soliman, Kelly A Hirko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tailoring Treatment for Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Experiential Learning in Career Development.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdi T GudinaDepartment of Biostatistics, Environmental Health Sciences and Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Kent State University, 120 Luther Ave, Kent, OH, 44240, USA. agudina@kent.edu.
Glenn CopelandMichigan Cancer Surveillance Program, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, MI, USA.
Amr S SolimanDepartment of Community Health and Social Medicine, Medical School of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Kelly A HirkoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Funding

Cancer Epidemiology Education in Special Populations Program-15R25CA112383 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Amr Soliman · 2006 to 2026
$6.1M
Cancer Epidemiology Education in Special Populations (CEESP) Grant R25 CA112383NCI NIH HHS R25 CA112383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile racial disparities in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) incidence are fairly well documented, with black women having significantly higher rates compared to white women; less is known about whether IBC prognosis differs by race/ethnicity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess racial/ethnic disparities in survival among women diagnosed with IBC in the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program (MCSP) from 1998 to 2014.

methodsWe examined the frequency and percentage of breast cancer cases coded to the various IBC codes in the MCSP registry over the study period. We used age-adjusted and multivariable Cox Proportional hazard regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations of race/ethnicity with all-cause mortality.

resultsUsing a comprehensive case definition of IBC, 1324 IBC patients were identified from women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in the MCSP [Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) = 227; Non-Hispanic White (NHW) = 984; Hispanic = 86; other = 27]. The percentage of all breast cancer cases defined as IBC in the MCSP registry differs considerably across registry codes from 0.02 to 1.1%. We observed significantly higher risk of death among NHB compared with NHW [HR (95% CI), 1.21 (1.01-1.45)], while no significant survival differences were observed between NHW and Hispanics or other racial/ethnic minorities.

conclusionsA comprehensive case definition should be utilized to avoid underestimation of IBC and to better understand this aggressive disease. Further research is needed to identify underlying causes and develop effective interventions to reduce IBC survival disparities between NHB and NHW women.

Indexed as

EthnicityHealth Status DisparitiesRacial GroupsAdultAgedCause of DeathConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicFemaleHumansInflammatory Breast NeoplasmsMichiganMiddle AgedPatient Outcome AssessmentPopulation SurveillanceProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesDisparitiesInflammatory breast cancerSurvival

Identifiers

PMID30406365
PMCPMC8279008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.