Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30406318›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2020

Neuroendoscopic biopsy: analysis of a series of 80 patients.

Ángela Ros-Sanjuán, Bienvenido Ros-López, Guillermo Ibáñez-Botella, Miguel Domínguez-Páez, Antonio Carrasco-Brenes, Miguel Ángel Arráez-Sánchez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ángela Ros-SanjuánNeurosurgery Department, Hospital Regional Universitario, University of Malaga, Av. Carlos Haya, s/n 29010, Málaga, Spain. rossanjuanangela@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0979-4367
Bienvenido Ros-LópezNeurosurgery Department, Hospital Regional Universitario, University of Malaga, Av. Carlos Haya, s/n 29010, Málaga, Spain.
Guillermo Ibáñez-BotellaNeurosurgery Department, Hospital Regional Universitario, University of Malaga, Av. Carlos Haya, s/n 29010, Málaga, Spain.
Miguel Domínguez-PáezNeurosurgery Department, Hospital Regional Universitario, University of Malaga, Av. Carlos Haya, s/n 29010, Málaga, Spain.
Antonio Carrasco-BrenesNeurosurgery Department, Hospital Regional Universitario, University of Malaga, Av. Carlos Haya, s/n 29010, Málaga, Spain.
Miguel Ángel Arráez-SánchezNeurosurgery Department, Hospital Regional Universitario, University of Malaga, Av. Carlos Haya, s/n 29010, Málaga, Spain.
Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendoscopy enables diagnostic biopsy of intraventricular and/or paraventricular tumors and the simultaneous treatment of associated hydrocephalus in selected cases. The objective of this paper was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of this procedure. This retrospective study included 80 patients between 2 months and 78 years old diagnosed with intraventricular and/or paraventricular expansive lesion who underwent neuroendoscopic biopsy from 2004 to 2016. Collected variables were gender, age at diagnosis, clinical presentation, tumor location, surgical technique, management of hydrocephalus, pathological findings, procedure-related complications, and follow-up time. Neuroendoscopic biopsy was performed in 80 patients. Mean age at diagnosis was 27 years, and 52.5% were men. According to the Depreitere Classification, 71 were level I (conclusive diagnosis), 1 level III (problematic categorization), and 8 level IV (non-interpretable diagnosis). The most frequent diagnosis was grade I astrocytoma (14%). Diagnostic success per patient was 88.7%. Sixty-nine patients had hydrocephalus at diagnosis, 37 of whom were treated with endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), with septostomy (SPT) in 14, and only SPT in 4. Twenty-eight patients underwent ventricular peritoneal shunt (VPS), with SPT in 20. The ETV success rate was 70.9%. The complication rate per patient was 11%: five patients presented intraventricular hemorrhage, three of whom died; one patient presented cerebrospinal fluid fistula; three presented transient oculomotor impairment. Postoperative follow-up was from 1 month to 12.4 years (mean 45 months). Neuroendoscopy is an effective procedure for the pathological diagnosis of intraventricular and paraventricular tumors, allowing the treatment of associated hydrocephalus. Nevertheless, it is not exempt from serious complications and requires proper training.

Indexed as

BiopsyNeuroendoscopyAdolescentAdultAgedAstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansHydrocephalusInfantMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesEndoscopic third ventriculostomyNeuroendoscopic biopsyNeuroendoscopyVentriculoperitoneal shunt

Identifiers

PMID30406318
OpenAlexW2899952060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.