ArticleNeurosurgical review2020
Neuroendoscopic biopsy: analysis of a series of 80 patients.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal therapeutic strategies for pineal region lesions.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendoscopy enables diagnostic biopsy of intraventricular and/or paraventricular tumors and the simultaneous treatment of associated hydrocephalus in selected cases. The objective of this paper was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of this procedure. This retrospective study included 80 patients between 2 months and 78 years old diagnosed with intraventricular and/or paraventricular expansive lesion who underwent neuroendoscopic biopsy from 2004 to 2016. Collected variables were gender, age at diagnosis, clinical presentation, tumor location, surgical technique, management of hydrocephalus, pathological findings, procedure-related complications, and follow-up time. Neuroendoscopic biopsy was performed in 80 patients. Mean age at diagnosis was 27 years, and 52.5% were men. According to the Depreitere Classification, 71 were level I (conclusive diagnosis), 1 level III (problematic categorization), and 8 level IV (non-interpretable diagnosis). The most frequent diagnosis was grade I astrocytoma (14%). Diagnostic success per patient was 88.7%. Sixty-nine patients had hydrocephalus at diagnosis, 37 of whom were treated with endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), with septostomy (SPT) in 14, and only SPT in 4. Twenty-eight patients underwent ventricular peritoneal shunt (VPS), with SPT in 20. The ETV success rate was 70.9%. The complication rate per patient was 11%: five patients presented intraventricular hemorrhage, three of whom died; one patient presented cerebrospinal fluid fistula; three presented transient oculomotor impairment. Postoperative follow-up was from 1 month to 12.4 years (mean 45 months). Neuroendoscopy is an effective procedure for the pathological diagnosis of intraventricular and paraventricular tumors, allowing the treatment of associated hydrocephalus. Nevertheless, it is not exempt from serious complications and requires proper training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.