ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2019
Single dose partial breast irradiation using an MRI linear accelerator in the supine and prone treatment position.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prone Breast Radiotherapy on the MR-Linac: A Technical Note on Skin-Couch Contact Dose Effects.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- Study protocol: Optimising patient positioning for the planning of accelerated partial breast radiotherapy for the integrated magnetic resonance linear accelerator: OPRAH MRL.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Review
- A narrative review for radiation oncologists to implement preoperative partial breast irradiation.La Radiologia medica · 2023Review
- Adaptive radiotherapy for breast cancer.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023Review
- Use of magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy for breast cancer: a scoping review.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2022Article
- Dosimetric variation in preoperative partial breast radiosurgery assessed by deformable image registrations.Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2022Article
- Patient positioning and immobilization procedures for hybrid MR-Linac systems.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2021Review
- The effect of imaging modality (magnetic resonance imaging vs. computed tomography) and patient position (supine vs. prone) on target and organ at risk doses in partial breast irradiation.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2021Article
- Optimizing MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Patient-Reported Tolerance of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiation Therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Visualization of the tumor cavity after lumpectomy of breast cancer for postoperative radiotherapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2019Article
- Characterization of Respiration-Induced Motion in Prone Versus Supine Patient Positioning for Thoracic Radiation Therapy.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn selected patients with early-stage and low-risk breast cancer, an MRI-linac based treatment might enable a radiosurgical, non-invasive alternative for current standard breast conserving therapy.
aimTo investigate whether single dose accelerated partial breast (APBI) to the intact tumor in both the prone and supine radiotherapy positions on the MRI-linac is dosimetrically feasible with respect to predefined coverage and organs at risk (OAR) constraints. MATERIAL &
methodsFor 20 patients with cTis or low-risk cT1N0M0 non-lobular breast carcinoma, previously treated with single dose preoperative APBI in the supine (n = 10) or prone (n = 10) position, additional intensity modulated radiotherapy plans with 7 coplanar beams in the presence of a 1.5T magnetic field were generated. A 20 Gy and 15 Gy dose was prescribed to the gross tumor and clinical target volume, respectively. The percentage of plans achieving predefined organ at risk (OAR) constraints, currently used in clinical practice, was assessed. Dosimetry differences between the prone versus supine approach and the MRI-linac versus clinically delivered plans were evaluated.
resultsAll MRI-linac plans met the coverage and predefined OAR constraints. The prone approach appeared to be more favorable with respect to the chest wall, and ipsilateral lung dose compared to the supine position. No dosimetric differences were observed for the ipsilateral breast. No treatment position was clearly more beneficial for the skin or heart, since dosimetry varied among parameters. Overall, the MRI-linac and clinical plans were comparable, with minor absolute dosimetric differences.
conclusionMRI-linac based single dose APBI to the intact tumor is a promising and a dosimetrically feasible strategy in patients with low-risk breast cancer. Preliminary OAR dosimetry favored the prone radiotherapy position.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.