Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30406187›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

As Soon as You Taste It: Evidence for Sequential and Parallel Processing of Gustatory Information.

Raphael Wallroth, Kathrin Ohla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Encoding Taste: From Receptors to Perception.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Taste Processing: Insights from Animal Models.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  9. Identification of an Amygdala-Thalamic Circuit That Acts as a Central Gain Mechanism in Taste Perceptions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  10. Macroscopic information-based taste representations in insular cortex are shaped by stimulus concentration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Studying language in context using the temporal generalization method.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Raphael WallrothPsychophysiology of Food Perception, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal 14558, Germany.
Kathrin OhlaPsychophysiology of Food Perception, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal 14558, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7265-0449
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quick and reliable detection and identification of a tastant in the mouth regulate nutrient uptake and toxin expulsion. Consistent with the pivotal role of the gustatory system, taste category information (e.g., sweet, salty) is represented during the earliest phase of the taste-evoked cortical response (Crouzet et al., 2015), and different tastes are perceived and responded to within only a few hundred milliseconds, in rodents (Perez et al., 2013) and humans (Bujas, 1935). Currently, it is unknown whether taste detection and discrimination are sequential or parallel processes, i.e., whether you know what it is as soon as you taste it. To investigate the sequence of processing steps involved in taste perceptual decisions, participants tasted sour, salty, bitter, and sweet solutions and performed a taste-detection and a taste-discrimination task. We measured response times (RTs) and 64-channel scalp electrophysiological recordings and tested the link between the timing of behavioral decisions and the timing of neural taste representations determined with multivariate pattern analyses. Irrespective of taste and task, neural decoding onset and behavioral RTs were strongly related, demonstrating that differences between taste judgments are reflected early during chemosensory encoding. Neural and behavioral detection times were faster for the iso-hedonic salty and sour tastes than their discrimination time. No such latency difference was observed for sweet and bitter, which differ hedonically. Together, these results indicate that the human gustatory system detects a taste faster than it discriminates between tastes, yet hedonic computations may run in parallel (Perez et al., 2013) and facilitate taste identification.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisPerceptionReaction TimeTasteTaste PerceptionYoung AdultdetectiondiscriminationEEGgustationMVPAtaste

Identifiers

PMID30406187
PMCPMC6220581
OpenAlexW2896828094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.