ReviewBioMed research international2018
CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A New Frontier in Cardiac Imaging.
Review in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac Computed Tomography in Structural Heart Interventions: From Preprocedural Planning to Procedural Strategy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Combined CCTA and Stress CTP for Anatomical and Functional Assessment of Myocardial Bridges.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Feasibility, Added Value, and Radiation Dose of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Stress Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Moderate Coronary Artery Disease: A Real-World Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Heart failure and microvascular dysfunction: an in-depth review of mechanisms, diagnostic strategies, and innovative therapies.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Reproducibility of a single-volume dynamic CT myocardial blood flow measurement technique: validation in a swine model.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: Challenges and Advances in Invasive and Non-Invasive Diagnostic Modalities.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion: The Role of Functional Evaluation in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Assessment of Computed Tomography Perfusion Research Landscape: A Topic Modeling Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- Noninvasive Multimodality Imaging for the Assessment of Anomalous Coronary Artery.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Low-dose quantitative CT myocardial flow measurement using a single volume scan: phantom and animal validation.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- The Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Focus on Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion and Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Novel fast FFR derived from coronary CT angiography based on static first-pass algorithm: a comparison study.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2023Article
- Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion without image registration.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Pathophysiologic Basis and Diagnostic Approaches for Ischemia With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries: A Literature Review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- The impact and challenges of implementing CTCA according to the 2019 ESC guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes: a survey and projection of CTCA services in the Netherlands.Insights into imaging · 2021Article
- Dual-Energy Heart CT: Beyond Better Angiography-Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Advances in translational imaging of the microcirculation.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2021Review
- Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients.European radiology · 2021Article
- Cardiac CT perfusion and FFRCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
- Technical development in cardiac CT: current standards and future improvements-a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The past two decades have witnessed rapid and remarkable technical improvement of multidetector computed tomography (CT) in both image quality and diagnostic accuracy. These improvements include higher temporal resolution, high-definition and wider detectors, the introduction of dual-source and dual-energy scanners, and advanced postprocessing. Current new generation multidetector row (≥64 slices) CT systems allow an accurate and reliable assessment of both coronary epicardial stenosis and myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) imaging at rest and during pharmacologic stress in the same examination. This novel application makes CT the unique noninvasive "one-stop-shop" method for a comprehensive assessment of both anatomical coronary atherosclerosis and its physiological consequences. Myocardial CTP imaging can be performed with different approaches such as static arterial first-pass imaging, and dynamic CTP imaging, with their own advantages and disadvantages. Static CTP can be performed using single-energy or dual-energy CT, employing qualitative or semiquantitative analysis. In addition, dynamic CTP can obtain quantitative data of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve. The purpose of this review was to summarize all available evidence about the emerging role of myocardial CTP to identify ischemia-associated lesions, focusing on technical considerations, clinical applications, strengths, limitations, and the more promising future fields of interest in the broad spectra of ischemic heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.