Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30406131›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2018

Outcome of Irrigation and Debridement after Failed Two-Stage Reimplantation for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

M Faschingbauer, F Boettner, R Bieger, C Weiner, H Reichel, T Kappe

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M FaschingbauerDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery, RKU, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9319-2416
F BoettnerHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
R BiegerDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery, RKU, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
C WeinerDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery, RKU, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
H ReichelDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery, RKU, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
T KappeDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery, RKU, University of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DEHospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTwo-stage revision is the gold standard for the treatment of deep implant infection after knee or hip arthroplasty. Irrigation and debridement may be a treatment option for failed 2-stage revisions in cases where a reinfection occurs within 30 days or the symptoms exist not longer than 3 weeks and is appealing because of its low morbidity. We determined the incidence of recurrent infections following irrigation and debridement for failed two-stage revision hip and knee arthroplasty.

methodsWe performed a single center retrospective review of periprosthetic hip and knee infections treated with a two-stage procedure from 2002 to 2010. All patients that subsequently underwent irrigation and debridement for a subsequent infection were selected for the current study.

results440 two-stage revisions were performed between 2002 and 2010. Fifty-one two-stage revisions failed (11.6%). Nineteen failed two-stage revisions were treated with irrigation and debridement; 12 (63.2%) patients remained free of infection at follow-up (mean follow-up: 39 months; range, 24-90 months), infection persisted in 6 patients (31.6%), and 1 patient died (5.3%).

conclusionsSuccess rates of irrigation and debridement for failed two-stage procedures are similar to the success rates of irrigation and debridement in primary implant infections. According to the current paper, irrigation and debridement are an acceptable treatment for acute reinfections after failed two-stage revision if performed within the first 30 postoperative days after failed two-stage procedure or if symptoms are present for less than 3 weeks in the presence of a susceptible organism.

Indexed as

DebridementProsthesis FailureReplantationAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansJointsKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis-Related InfectionsTherapeutic IrrigationTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID30406131
PMCPMC6201492
OpenAlexW2897186763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.