Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30405980›Full record

ArticleCureus2018

Investigating the Efficacy of Anatomical Silicone Models Developed from a 3D Printed Mold for Perineal Repair Suturing Simulation.

Christine Goudie, Jessica Shanahan, Atamjit Gill, Deanna Murphy, Adam Dubrowski

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A 3D-Printed Dummy for Training Distal Phalanx Amputation in Mice.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine GoudieMed 3d Network, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN.
Jessica ShanahanObstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN.
Atamjit GillObstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial University, St. John's, CAN.
Deanna MurphyObstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial University, St. John's, CAN.
Adam DubrowskiEmergency Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN.
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CASt. John's University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a scarcity of affordable, validated, standardized and anatomically correct silicone perineum models for the rehearsal of postpartum laceration repair. The purpose of this technical report is to describe and validate evidence for a silicone, perineal repair model created from a 3D printed mold for medical resident training and clinical skills maintenance. A pre-existing model from an open-source royalty-free website was purchased and converted using Fusion360

Indexed as

3d printinggynecologyobstetricsperineal repairperineumpostpartumsimulationsurgery

Identifiers

PMID30405980
PMCPMC6205908
OpenAlexW2888196412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.