Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30405976›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2018

An Adaptive Seismocardiography (SCG)-ECG Multimodal Framework for Cardiac Gating Using Artificial Neural Networks.

Jingting Yao, S Tridandapani, W F Auffermann, C A Wick, P T Bhatti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An Adaptive SCG-ECG Multimodal Gating Framework for Cardiac CTA.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jingting YaoSchool of Electrical and Computer EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaGA30332USA.
S TridandapaniDepartment of RadiologyThe University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAL35294USA.
W F AuffermannDepartment of Radiology and Imaging SciencesSchool of MedicineThe University of UtahSalt LakeUT84132USA.
C A WickCamerad TechnologiesGlobal Center for Medical InnovationAtlantaGA30318USA.
P T BhattiSchool of Electrical and Computer EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaGA30332USA.

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
AN INNOVATIVE ULTRASOUND-BASED PROSPECTIVE-GATING TECHNIQUE FOR CARDIAC COMPUTEDK23EB013221 · NIBIB · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI TRIDANDAPANI, SRINI · 2011 to 2013
$541k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NIBIB NIH HHS K23 EB013221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To more accurately trigger data acquisition and reduce radiation exposure of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), a multimodal framework utilizing both electrocardiography (ECG) and seismocardiography (SCG) for CCTA prospective gating is presented. Relying upon a three-layer artificial neural network that adaptively fuses individual ECG- and SCG-based quiescence predictions on a beat-by-beat basis, this framework yields a personalized quiescence prediction for each cardiac cycle. This framework was tested on seven healthy subjects (age: 22-48; m/f: 4/3) and eleven cardiac patients (age: 31-78; m/f: 6/5). Seventeen out of 18 benefited from the fusion-based prediction as compared to the ECG-only-based prediction, the traditional prospective gating method. Only one patient whose SCG was compromised by noise was more suitable for ECG-only-based prediction. On average, our fused ECG-SCG-based method improves cardiac quiescence prediction by 47% over ECG-only-based method; with both compared against the gold standard, B-mode echocardiography. Fusion-based prediction is also more resistant to heart rate variability than ECG-only- or SCG-only-based prediction. To assess the clinical value, the diagnostic quality of the CCTA reconstructed volumes from the quiescence derived from ECG-, SCG- and fusion-based predictions were graded by a board-certified radiologist using a Likert response format. Grading results indicated the fusion-based prediction improved diagnostic quality. ECG may be a sub-optimal modality for quiescence prediction and can be enhanced by the multimodal framework. The combination of ECG and SCG signals for quiescence prediction bears promise for a more personalized and reliable approach than ECG-only-based method to predict cardiac quiescence for prospective CCTA gating.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networkscardiac gatingcardiac quiescencecomputed tomography angiographycoronary angiographyechocardiographyelectrocardiographymultimodal gatingseismocardiography

Identifiers

PMID30405976
PMCPMC6204924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.