ArticleJournal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran)2018
Microleakage of an Enhanced Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorative Material in Primary Molars.
Article in Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of bioactive and conventional liners on marginal sealing and dentin bond strength of Class V resin composite restorations: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Microleakage of Different Forms of Glass Ionomer Cements in Primary Molars: AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Elemental analysis and micromorphological patterns of tooth/restoration interface of three ion-releasing class V restorations.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Comparison between Different Bulk-Fill and Incremental Composite Materials Used for Class II Restorations in Primary and Permanent Teeth: In Vitro Assessments.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of Shear Bond Strength and Microleakage between Activa™ Bioactive Restorative™ and Bulk-Fill Composites-An In Vitro Study.Polymers · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the Effect of Nanographene Oxide on Microleakage of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer.International journal of dentistry · 2023Article
- Radiopaque Crystalline, Non-Crystalline and Nanostructured Bioceramics.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Marginal microleakage and modified microtensile bond strength of Activa Bioactive, in comparison with conventional restorative materials.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2022Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Bioactive, Ormocer, and Conventional GIC Restorative Materials in Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study Microleakage of Three Restorative Materials.International journal of dentistry · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Newly Introduced Bioactive Materials in Terms of Cavity Floor Adaptation: OCT Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Effects of Bacterial Cellulose Nanocrystals on the Mechanical Properties of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements.European journal of dentistry · 2021Article
- Organic Eluates Derived from Intermediate Restorative Dental Materials.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Bio-Inductive Materials in Direct and Indirect Pulp Capping-A Review Article.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Reactions of Subcutaneous Connective Tissue to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Biodentine®, and a Newly Developed BioACTIVE Base/Liner.Scanning · 2020Article
- Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Three Glass Ionomer-Based Class V Restorations: In Vitro Study.European journal of dentistry · 2019Article
- Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2019Article
- Fracture resistance of pulpotomized and composite-restored primary molars: Incremental versus bulk-fill techniques.Dental research journalArticle
- Evaluation of Effect of Dietary Solvents on Bond Strength of Compomer, Ormocer, Nanocomposite and Activa Bioactive Restorative Materials.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesResin composites, glass ionomers (GIs), or a combination of these materials have gradually replaced silver amalgam in pediatric dentistry. The purpose of this study was to compare the microleakage of Class II (box only) cavity restorations with ACTIVA Bioactive Restorative Glass, resin-modified GI (RMGI), and composite in primary molars. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 65 primary molars with at least one intact proximal surface were selected in this in-vitro study. After debridement of each tooth, Class II (box only) cavities were prepared. Based on the type of the restorative material and the application of etching and bonding adhesives, the samples were categorized into five groups: (1) composite; (2) RMGI (Fuji II LC)+conditioner; (3) RMGI (Fuji II LC); (4) enhanced RMGI (ACTIVA Bioactive Restorative Glass)+etching/bonding; and (5) ACTIVA Bioactive Restorative Glass. The restored teeth were thermocycled for 2000 cycles. After embedding in an acrylic resin, the degree of dye penetration at axial and gingival walls was assessed using a stereomicroscope. The data were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test.
resultsResin-based composite (RBC) Z250 showed the least microleakage, while RMGI showed maximum microleakage at axial walls. The mean degree of microleakage at gingival margins was the lowest in RBC Z250 and ACTIVA+etching/bonding groups and the highest in RMGI+conditioner and RMGI groups.
conclusionsThe microleakage of ACTIVA Bioactive Restorative material in the absence or presence of etching and bonding could be comparable to the microleakage of composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30405729PMC6218465W2888434650What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.