Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30405715›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biomaterials2018

Evaluation of Sterilisation Techniques for Regenerative Medicine Scaffolds Fabricated with Polyurethane Nonbiodegradable and Bioabsorbable Nanocomposite Materials.

Michelle Griffin, Naghmeh Naderi, Deepak M Kalaskar, Edward Malins, Remzi Becer, Catherine A Thornton, Iain S Whitaker, Ash Mosahebi, Peter E M Butler, Alexander M Seifalian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biomaterials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Exploiting Unique Features of Microneedles to Modulate Immunity.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Protein-Based 3D Biofabrication of Biomaterials.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle GriffinUCL Centre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, University College London, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2027-547X
Naghmeh NaderiUCL Centre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, University College London, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Deepak M KalaskarUCL Centre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, University College London, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Edward MalinsPolymer Chemistry Laboratory, School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Remzi BecerPolymer Chemistry Laboratory, School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Catherine A ThorntonReconstructive Surgery & Regenerative Medicine Group, Institute of Life Science, Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Iain S WhitakerReconstructive Surgery & Regenerative Medicine Group, Institute of Life Science, Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Ash MosahebiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Peter E M ButlerUCL Centre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, University College London, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Alexander M SeifalianDirector/Professor Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, NanoRegMed Ltd., The London BioScience Innovation Centre, London NW1 0NH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1180-3322
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBSwansea Bay University Health Board · GBLondon Centre for Nanotechnology · GBSwansea University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An effective sterilisation technique that maintains structure integrity, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility is essential for the translation of new biomaterials to the clinical setting. We aimed to establish an effective sterilisation technique for a biodegradable (POSS-PCL) and nonbiodegradable (POSS-PCU) nanocomposite scaffold that maintains stem cell biocompatibility. Scaffolds were sterilised using 70% ethanol, ultraviolet radiation, bleach, antibiotic/antimycotic, ethylene oxide, gamma irradiation, argon plasma, or autoclaving. Samples were immersed in tryptone soya broth and thioglycollate medium and inspected for signs of microbial growth. Scaffold surface and mechanical and molecular weight properties were investigated. AlamarBlue viability assay of adipose derived stem cells (ADSC) seeded on scaffolds was performed to investigate metabolic activity. Confocal imaging of rhodamine phalloidin and DAPI stained ADSCs was performed to evaluate morphology. Ethylene oxide, gamma irradiation, argon plasma, autoclaving, 70% ethanol, and bleach were effective in sterilising the scaffolds. Autoclaving, gamma irradiation, and ethylene oxide led to a significant change in the molecular weight distribution of POSS-PCL and gamma irradiation and ethylene oxide to that of POSS-PCU (p<0.05). UV, ethanol, gamma irradiation, and ethylene oxide caused significant changes in the mechanical properties of POSS-PCL (p<0.05). Argon was associated with significantly higher surface wettability and ADSC metabolic activity (p<0.05). In this study, argon plasma was an effective sterilisation technique for both nonbiodegradable and biodegradable nanocomposite scaffolds. Argon plasma should be further investigated as a potential sterilisation technique for medical devices.

Identifiers

PMID30405715
PMCPMC6192142
OpenAlexW2895553666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.