Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30405677›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

The MAP3K-Coding

Micaela Mancini, Hugo Permingeat, Carolina Colono, Lorena Siena, Fulvio Pupilli, Celeste Azzaro, Diva Maria de Alencar Dusi, Vera Tavares de Campos Carneiro, Maricel Podio, José Guillermo Seijo and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Spotting the Targets of the Apospory ControllerPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Micaela ManciniInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario, CONICET-UNR, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Zavalla, Argentina.
Hugo PermingeatInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario, CONICET-UNR, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Zavalla, Argentina.
Carolina ColonoInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario, CONICET-UNR, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Zavalla, Argentina.
Lorena SienaInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario, CONICET-UNR, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Zavalla, Argentina.
Fulvio PupilliIstituto di Bioscienze e BioRisorse, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Perugia, Italy.
Celeste AzzaroInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario, CONICET-UNR, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Zavalla, Argentina.
Diva Maria de Alencar DusiParque Estação Biológica, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Brazil.
Vera Tavares de Campos CarneiroParque Estação Biológica, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, Brazil.
Maricel PodioInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario, CONICET-UNR, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Zavalla, Argentina.
José Guillermo SeijoInstituto de Botánica del Nordeste, CONICET-UNNE, Corrientes, Argentina.
Ana María GonzálezInstituto de Botánica del Nordeste, CONICET-UNNE, Corrientes, Argentina.
Silvina A FelittiInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario, CONICET-UNR, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Zavalla, Argentina.
Juan Pablo A OrtizInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario, CONICET-UNR, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Zavalla, Argentina.
Olivier LeblancDIADE, Univ Montpellier, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Silvina C PessinoInstituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario, CONICET-UNR, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Zavalla, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apomixis is a clonal mode of reproduction via seeds, which results from the failure of meiosis and fertilization in the sexual female reproductive pathway. In previous transcriptomic surveys, we identified a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (N46) displaying differential representation in florets of sexual and apomictic

Indexed as

apomixisaposporyLNC-QGJMAP3KPaspalum notatumplant reproductionQGJQUI-GON

Identifiers

PMID30405677
PMCPMC6207905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.