Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30405554›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Understanding the Biomineralization Role of Magnetite-Interacting Components (MICs) From Magnetotactic Bacteria.

Hila Nudelman, Yi-Zong Lee, Yi-Lin Hung, Sofiya Kolusheva, Alexander Upcher, Yi-Chen Chen, Jih-Ying Chen, Shih-Che Sue, Raz Zarivach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ACS central science · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Studying Peptide-Metal Ion Complex Structures by Solution-State NMR.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hila NudelmanDepartment of Life Sciences and the National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Yi-Zong LeeInstitute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yi-Lin HungInstitute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Sofiya KolushevaIlse Katz Institute for Nanoscale Science & Technology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Alexander UpcherIlse Katz Institute for Nanoscale Science & Technology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Yi-Chen ChenInstitute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Jih-Ying ChenInstitute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Shih-Che SueInstitute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Raz ZarivachDepartment of Life Sciences and the National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
National Tsing Hua University · TWBen-Gurion University of the Negev · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomineralization is a process that takes place in all domains of life and which usually helps organisms to harden soft tissues by creating inorganic structures that facilitate their biological functions. It was shown that biominerals are under tight biological control via proteins that are involved in nucleation initiation and/or which act as structural skeletons. Magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) use iron biomineralization to create nano-magnetic particles in a specialized organelle, the magnetosome, to align to the geomagnetic field. A specific set of magnetite-associated proteins (MAPs) is involved in regulating magnetite nucleation, size, and shape. These MAPs are all predicted to contain specific 17-22 residue-long sequences involved in magnetite formation. To understand the mechanism of magnetite formation, we focused on three different MAPs, MamC, Mms6 and Mms7, and studied the predicted iron-binding sequences. Using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), we differentiated the recognition mode of each MAP based on ion specificity, affinity, and binding residues. The significance of critical residues in each peptide was evaluated by mutation followed by an iron co-precipitation assay. Among the peptides, MamC showed weak ion binding but created the most significant effect in enhancing magnetite particle size, indicating the potency in controlling magnetite particle shape and size. Alternatively, Mms6 and Mms7 had strong binding affinities but less effect in modulating magnetite particle size, representing their major role potentially in initiating nucleation by increasing local metal concentration. Overall, our results explain how different MAPs affect magnetite synthesis, interact with Fe

Indexed as

biomineralizationmagnetite-associated proteinsmagnetotactic bacteriaMamCMms6Mms7protein–mineral interactions

Identifiers

PMID30405554
PMCPMC6206293
OpenAlexW2897375174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.