ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2018
Understanding and Predicting Antidepressant Response: Using Animal Models to Move Toward Precision Psychiatry.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Individual response to antidepressants for depression in adults-a meta-analysis and simulation study.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Lost in translation: toward clinically effective translational research.Translational psychiatry · 2025Review
- Neuron-Specific Glycine Metabolism Links Transfer RNA Epitranscriptomic Regulation to Complex Behaviors.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025Article
- Behavioral characterization of triple-hit schizophrenia-like Lisket rats derived from the Long Evans strain through acute and chronic behavioral tests.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Article
- Individual Differences in Volitional Social Self-Administration and Motivation in Male and Female Mice Following Social Stress.Biological psychiatry · 2024Article
- Cross-species analysis uncovers the mitochondrial stress response in the hippocampus as a shared mechanism in mouse early life stress and human depression.Neurobiology of stress · 2024Article
- Identifying reproducible resting state networks and functional connectivity alterations following chronic restraint stress in anaesthetized rats.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Modern views of machine learning for precision psychiatry.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Review
- Crosstalk Among NLRP3 Inflammasome, ETNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021Article
- A distinct transcriptional signature of antidepressant response in hippocampal dentate gyrus granule cells.Translational psychiatry · 2021Article
- Fast-acting antidepressant-like effects of Reelin evaluated in the repeated-corticosterone chronic stress paradigm.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020Article
- Assessment of Ketamine and Its Enantiomers in an Organophosphate-Based Rat Model for Features of Gulf War Illness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Decoding the Mechanism of Action of Rapid-Acting Antidepressant Treatment Strategies: Does Gender Matter?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are two important gaps of knowledge in depression treatment, namely the lack of biomarkers predicting response to antidepressants and the limited knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying clinical improvement. However, individually tailored treatment strategies and individualized prescription are greatly needed given the huge socio-economic burden of depression, the latency until clinical improvement can be observed and the response variability to a particular compound. Still, individual patient-level antidepressant treatment outcomes are highly unpredictable. In contrast to other therapeutic areas and despite tremendous efforts during the past years, the genomics era so far has failed to provide biological or genetic predictors of clinical utility for routine use in depression treatment. Specifically, we suggest to (1) shift the focus from the group patterns to individual outcomes, (2) use dimensional classifications such as Research Domain Criteria, and (3) envision better planning and improved connections between pre-clinical and clinical studies within translational research units. In contrast to studies in patients, animal models enable both searches for peripheral biosignatures predicting treatment response and in depth-analyses of the neurobiological pathways shaping individual antidepressant response in the brain. While there is a considerable number of animal models available aiming at mimicking disease-like conditions such as those seen in depressive disorder, only a limited number of preclinical or truly translational investigations is dedicated to the issue of heterogeneity seen in response to antidepressant treatment. In this mini-review, we provide an overview on the current state of knowledge and propose a framework for successful translational studies into antidepressant treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.